• Labong, J.A.M Department of Philosophy, University of the Philippines - Diliman, Philippines




Kant, objectification, bodily services, Araki, explicit photograph, female nude


The thin line between art and politics concerning women’s objectification is one of the most apparent problems in the representation of the female body in sex markets and creative spaces. This paper aims to explore and provide a philosophical analysis on women’s objectification and the male construction of female sexuality and femininity apparent in Nobuyoshi Araki’s controversial and sexually explicit photographs. To attain this, I derive from the ethical theory of Kant and his views on the “beautiful” embodied by women, and the moral problem presented by Nussbaum on the legalization of bodily services. I employ the carceral-neoliberalism approach through the method of philosophical analysis to problematize the treatment of women’s bodies under the sheets of high-value art, policy-making, and commodification. The curatorial and commentary of Araki’s photographs as case studies aim to juxtapose the ethical theories and the underlying problems of female sexuality. Therefore, the peculiarities in Araki’s works—presented as the female nude—are addressed and problematized. The discussions are divided in the following: (1) Kantian notions on the female, (2) Nussbaum’s theory on bodily services, (3) Carceral-neoliberalism approach to feminism, and (4) the case study on Araki’s sexually explicit photographs. The results of the discussion show that the portrayal of women in Araki’s photographs establishes the link between the female's body and her sexuality. Assertions of objectification and personification are byproducts of the male gaze as well as a patriarchal indoctrination and colonization of women and their bodies. Repercussions of neoliberalism are also reflected in the marketization of women. I finally conclude that the necessity of continuously framing the problems in women’s sexuality should be recognized so stigmatization against women may be eradicated.




Araki, N. & Artuner. (1995–2008a). KINBAKU, 1995–2008 [Photograph]. Artuner. https://www.artuner.com/shop/kinbaku-1995-2008-2016-nobuyoshi-araki/

Araki, N. & Artuner. (1995–2008b). KINBAKU, 1995–2008/2017 [Photograph]. Artuner. https://www.artuner.com/shop/kinbaku-1995-2008-2016-2-nobuyoshi-araki/

Araki, N. & Artuner. (2008a). KINBAKU 2008 [Photograph]. Artuner. https://www.artuner.com/shop/kinbaku-2008-2016-4-nobuyoshi-araki/ Araki, N. & Artuner. (2008b). KINBAKU, 2008/2017 [Photograph]. Artuner. https://www.artuner.com/shop/kinbaku-2008-2016-3-nobuyoshi-araki/

Artspace Editors. (2018). “You Need to Feel You’re Actually Being Violated”: The Words of Controversial Photographer Nobuyoshi Araki in the Wake of the #MeToo Movement. Artspace. https://www.artspace.com/magazine/interviews_features/book_report/photography-is-a-menage a-trois-nobuyoshi-araki-55282

Bernstein, E. (2012). Carceral politics as gender justice? The “traffic in women” and neoliberal circuits of crime, sex, and rights. Theory and Society, 41(3), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-012-9165-9

Lederman, R. (2018). Can a Feminist Embrace Araki? Aperture. https://aperture.org/editorial/feminism-nobuyoshi-araki/

Mikkola, M. (2011). Kant On Moral Agency and Women’s Nature. Kantian Review, 16(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415410000014

Mosser, K. (1999). Kant and Feminism. Kant-Studien, 90(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1999.90.3.322

Nead, L. (1990). The Female Nude: Pornography, Art, and Sexuality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/494586

Neiley, B. (2018). Female Nudity in Renaissance Art: Feminist Ethical Considerations. NYU GALLATIN. https://confluence.gallatin.nyu.edu/context/first-year-writing-seminar/the-ethics-of-the-female-nu de

Nussbaum, M. (1998). “Whether From Reason Or Prejudice”: Taking Money For Bodily Services. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1086/468040 Primoratz, I. (2001). Sexual morality: Is consent enough? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011878215852

Saul, J. M. (2006). On Treating Things as People: Objectification, Pornography, and the History of the Vibrator. Hypatia, 21(2), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01093.x

Shafer-Landau, R. (2021). Kantian Ethics. In Living Ethics (pp. 76–85). Oxford University Press.

Snow, E. (1989). Theorizing the Male Gaze: Some Problems. Representations, 25, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928465

Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2010). Sexual Objectification of Women: Advances to Theory and Research 1ψ7. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402

Vittachi, B. (2016). Out of the classroom: The Paradoxes of Nobuyoshi Araki. ARTUNER | Curated Contemporary Art.


Yi, H. (2011). Crossing Boundaries: An Interview with Nobuyoshi Araki. TAP. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/t/tap/7977573.0001.205/--crossing-boundaries-an-interview-with-nob uyoshi-araki?rgn=main;view=fulltext




How to Cite

Labong, J. (2022). ON THE FEMALE NUDE, SEXUAL BODILY SERVICES, AND WOMEN’S OBJECTIFICATION: A CASE STUDY ON ARAKI’S SEXUALLY EXPLICIT PHOTOGRAPHS. Proceedings of the World Conference on Women’s Studies, 7(01), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246743.2022.7101