CONSUMERS’ CONSCIOUSNESS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FISHERY PRODUCTS WITH ECOLABELS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ITALY

AN ITALIAN EMPIRICAL STUDY

Authors

  • Erica Varese Department of Management, University of Turin, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-8187
  • Anna Claudia Pellicelli Department of Management, University of Turin (Italy)
  • Luigi Bollani Department of Social-Economic and Mathematical-Statistical Science, University of Turin, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/23861282.2021.7104

Keywords:

consumer attitude, willingness to pay (WTP), ecolabels, fishery products, purchase intention, multivariate analysis

Abstract

This research concerns ecolabels in the fishery sector and its main objectives are to verify: 1) whether they are recognized and their meaning is known by culturally qualified young consumers and 2) whether it is possible to quantify these consumers’ “willingness to pay” (WTP) for fish products bearing ecolabels. Literature review has shown that even though over the years many studies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) labelling were carried out, only few focused exclusively on the fishery sector, analysing the young consumers’ point of view. Following literature review, a questionnaire was designed. The measurement scale used in this study was adapted from scales validated in previous papers and double checked against field literature. The final part of this research investigates the sentiment of 411 students of the University of Turin (Italy), employing multivariate statistical methods. The results of this analysis point out that most of the investigated students (39.41%) on the one hand are very poorly informed about this topic but on the other hand have a medium WTP. Familiarity with ecolabels may improve consumers’ sustainability awareness, enabling purchasers to make informed choices. Ecolabels can also support the sea environment avoiding overfishing and the risk of depletion of certain fish stock.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, C., Altintzoglou, T., Cabral, H., & Vaz, S. (2015). Does seafood knowledge relate to more sustainable consumption? British Food Journal, 117(2), 894-914. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2014-0156.

Alos-Simo, L., Verdu-Jover, A.J., & Gomez-Gras, J.M. (2020). Does activity sector matter for the relationship between eco-innovation and performance? Implications for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121544. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121544.

Annunziata, A., & Scarpato, D. (2014). Factors affecting consumer attitudes towards food products with sustainable attributes. Agricultural Economics/Zemedelska Ekonomika, 60(8), 353-363.

Annunziata, A., Ianuario, S., & Pascale, P. (2011). Consumers’ attitudes toward labelling of ethical products: The case of organic and Fair Trade products. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 17(5), 518-535. doi: 10.1080/10454446.2011.618790.

ANSA (2018). Italia prima in Ue per consumi di pesce, 28 kg a testa (+2%). Available at: http://www.ansa.it/canale_terraegusto/notizie/dal_mare/2018/11/21/italia-prima-in-ue-per-consumi-di-pesce-28-kg-a-testa-2_a8d23769-4336-4488-a0ae-1c7b9c66e6b7.html (accessed 18 May 2021).

Asche, F., &Guillen, J. (2012). The importance of fishing method, gear and origin: the Spanish hake market. Marine Policy, 36, 365-369. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.07.005.

Asioli, D., Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Nayga Jr, R.M. (2020). Sustainability-related food labels. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 171-185. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094103.

Asioli, D., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Caputo, V., Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., Næs, T., & Varela, P. (2017). Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Research International, 99, 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022.

Bazzani, C., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R.M., &Canavari, M. (2017). Revisiting consumers’ valuation for local versus organic food using a non-hypothetical choice experiment: Does personality matter? Food Quality and Preference, 62, 144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.019.

Bollani, L., Peira, G., Varese, E., Nesi, E., Pairotti, M.B., & Bonadonna, A. (2017). Labelling and sustainability in the green food economy: Perception among millennials with a good cultural background. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 2, 83-101. doi: 10.3280/RISS2017-002007.

Bollani, L., Varese, E., & Pellicelli, A.C. (2018). Attitude towards food labelling bearing sustainable quality marks: an empirical evidence. In: Proceedings 24th International Sustainable Development Research Society Conference “Actions for a sustainable world. From theory to practice”. University of Messina, Messina (Italy), June, 13-15; 606-613.

Carrero, I., & Valor, C. (2012). CSR‐labelled products in retailers’ assortment: A comparative study of British and Spanish retailers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(8), 629-652. doi: 10.1108/09590551211245425.

Cerri, J., Testa, F., & Rizzi, F. (2018). The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers’ attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 343-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.054.

Clonan, A., Holdsworth, M., Swift, J., & Wilson, R. (2010). UK Consumers Priorities for Sustainable Food Purchases. 84th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Edinburgh 29-31 March 2010.

D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., & Lamb, P. (2006). An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(2), 162-173. doi: 10.1108/13563280610661697.

D’Souza, C., Taghian, M., Lamb, P., & Peritatko, R. (2007). Green decisions: demographics and consumer understanding of environmental labels”. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 371-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00567.x.

Del Giudice, T., Stranieri, S., Caracciolo, F., Ricci, E.C., Cembalo, L., Banterle, A., & Cicia, G. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility certifications influence consumer preferences and seafood market price. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.276.

Drexler, D., Fiala, J., Havlíčková, A., Potůčková, A., & Souček, M. (2017). The effect of organic food labels on consumer attention. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 24(4), 441-455. doi: 10.1080/10454446.2017.1311815.

Ecolabel Index (2021). All ecolabels. Available at: http://www.ecolabelindex.com (accessed 18 May 2021).

Eldesouky, A., Mesias, F. J., & Escribano, M. (2020). Perception of Spanish consumers towards environmentally friendly labelling in food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 44(1), 64-76. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12546.

Escofier, B., & Pagès, J. (2005). Analyses factorielles simples et multiples: objectifs, méthodes et interpretation. Dunod, Paris (France).

Esselunga a casa (2021). Tonno in scatola. Available at:https://www.esselungaacasa.it/ecommerce/nav/auth/supermercato/home.html?utm_campaign=ESS_aon&utm_source=sito_esselunga&utm_term=top_dx&utm_content=quicklink_esselunga_a_casa&utm_medium=internal&push_login=true&esseiaOtp=d5537a632bfaa6048e2defe1a32da627c9b96620#!/negozio/ricerca/TONNO%20IN%20SCATOLA?facet=1 (Accessed 10 October 2021).

FAO (2018). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018. Meeting the sustainable development goals. FAO, Rome (IT).

FAO (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. FAO, Rome (IT). doi: 10.4060/ca9229en (accessed 18 May 2021).

FAO (2021). The nutritional benefits of fish are unique. Available at: http://www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/fishery-information/resource-detail/es/c/338772/ (accessed 18 May 2021).

Feucht, Y., & Zander, K. (2018). Consumers’ preferences for carbon labels and the underlying reasoning. A mixed methods approach in 6 European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 740-748. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.236.

Fliess, B., Lee, H.J., Dubreuil, O.L., & Agatiello, O. (2007). CSR and trade: informing consumers about social and environmental conditions of globalised production: Part I. OECD Trade Policy Paper No 47 OECD Publishing, Paris (FR).

Follows, S.B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: a test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723-746. doi: 10.1108/03090560010322009.

García-Martín, M., Torralba, M., Quintas-Soriano, C., Kahl, J., & Plieninger, T. (2020). Linking food systems and landscape sustainability in the Mediterranean region. Landscape Ecology, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01168-5.

Greenacre, M., (2007). Correspondence Analysis in Practice. London. Academic Press, Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics, Boca Raton, FL.

Grunert, K.G., & Aachmann, K. (2016), “Consumer reactions to the use of EU quality labels on food products: A review of the literature”, Food Control, Vol. 59 January 2016, 178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.021.

Grunert, K.G., Hieke, S., &Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001.

Grunert, K.G., Sonntag, W.I., & Glanz-Chanos, V. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat science, 137, 123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022.

Hadjimichael, M., & Hegland, T.J. (2016). Really sustainable? Inherent risks of eco-labeling in fisheries. Fisheries Research, 174(2016), 129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.09.012.

Hammarlund, C. (2015). The Big, the Bad, and the Average: Hedonic Prices and Inverse Demand for Baltic Cod. Marine Resource Economics, 30(2), 157-177. doi: 10.1086/679972.

Hartlieb, S., & Jones, B. (2009). Humanising business through ethical labelling: progress and paradoxes in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 583-600. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0125-x.

Hoek, A.C., Pearson, D., James, S.W., Lawrence, M.A., & Friel, S. (2017). Healthy and environmentally sustainable food choices: Consumer responses to point-of-purchase actions. Food quality and preference, 58, 94-106. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.12.008.

Honkanen, P., & Ottar Olsen, S. (2009). Environmental and animal welfare issues in food choice: the case of farmed fish. British Food Journal, 111(3), 293-309. doi: 10.1108/00070700910941480.

Honkanen, P., & Young, J.A. (2015). What determines British consumers’ motivation to buy sustainable seafood?. British Food Journal, 117(4), 1289-1302. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-06-2014-0199.

Ipsos (2019). Global attitudes about sustainable fishing and policies to curb overfishing. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-01/report-sustainable-fishing-global-advisor-20191202.pdf (accessed 8 October 2021).

Jacobs, S., Sioen, I., Marques, A., & Verbeke, W. (2018). Consumer response to health and environmental sustainability information regarding seafood consumption. Environmental research, 161, 492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.052.

Jaffry, S., Pickering, H., Ghulam, Y., Whitmarsh, D., & Wattage, P. (2004). Consumer choices for quality and sustainability labelled seafood products in the UK. Food Policy, 29(3), 215-228. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.04.001.

Katt, F., & Meixner, O. (2020). A systematic review of drivers influencing consumer willingness to pay for organic food. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 100, 374-388. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.029.

Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132-135. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.75.4.132.

Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 503-520. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006155.

Leach, A.M., Emery, K.A., Gephart, J., Davis, K.F., Erisman, J.W., Leip, A., Pace, M.L., D’Odorico, P., Carr, J., Noll, L.C., & Castner, E. (2016). Environmental impact food labels combining carbon, nitrogen, and water footprints. Food Policy, 61, 213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.03.006.

Lee, K. (2014). Predictors of sustainable consumption among young educated consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(3), 217-238. doi: 10.1080/08961530.2014.900249.

Li, N., Wu, X., Zhuang, W., Xia, L., Chen, Y., Wu, C., Rao, Z., Du, L., Zhao, R., Yi, M., Wan Q., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Fish consumption and multiple health outcomes: Umbrella review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 99, 273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.033.

Li, X., Tan H., & Rackes, A. (2015). Carbon footprint analysis of student behavior for a sustainable University campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.084.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology. New York (USA).

Loureiro, M.L., & Lotade, J. (2005). Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? Ecological Economics, 53(1), 129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.002.

Maesano, G., Di Vita, G., Chinnici, G., Pappalardo, G., & D'Amico, M. (2020). The Role of Credence Attributes in Consumer Choices of Sustainable Fish Products: A Review. Sustainability, 12(23), 10008. doi: 10.3390/su122310008.

Mäkiniemi, J.P., Pirttilä-Backman, A.M., & Pieri, M. (2011). Ethical and unethical food. Social representations among Finnish, Danish and Italian students. Appetite, 56(2), 495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.023.

Maxwell, S.M., Hazen, E.L., Lewison R.L., Dunn, D.C., Bailey, H., Bograd, S.J., Briscoe, D.K., Fossette, S., Hobday, A.J., Bennett, M., Benson, S., Caldwell, M.R., Costa, D.P., Dewar, H., Eguchi, T., Hazen, L., Kohin, S., Sippel, T., & Crowder, L.B. (2015). Dynamic ocean management: defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean”. Marine Policy, 58, 42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.014.

Mori Junior, R., Franks, D.M., & Ali, S.H. (2016). Sustainability certification schemes: evaluating their effectiveness and adaptability. Corporate Governance, 16(3), 579-592. doi: 10.1108/CG-03-2016-0066.

OECD (2009). Consumer education. Policy recommendations of the OECD’s committee on Consumer Policy. OECD Publishing, Paris (FR).

OECD (2021). Fisheries and Aquaculture in Italy. January 2021. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/fisheries-and-aquaculture/documents/report_cn_fish_ita.pdf (accessed 8 October 2021).

Oliwa, B. (2021). The Concept of the Triple Bottom Line as a Link Between Sustainability and CSR. In Adapting and Mitigating Environmental, Social, and Governance Risk in Business, 1-25. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-6788-3.ch001.

Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107(8), 606-625. doi: 10.1108/00070700510611002.

Panico, T., Del Giudice, T., Amato, M., Caracciolo, F., & Verneau, F. (2014). Evaluating Italian attitude and behaviour toward Fair Trade products. Rivista di Economia Agraria/Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 69(2-3), 211-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.13128/REA-16923.

Petrescu, D.C., Vermeir, I., & Petrescu-Mag, R.M. (2020). Consumer understanding of food quality, healthiness, and environmental impact: A cross-national perspective. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(1), 169. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010169.

Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. The Dynamics of the eco-efficient economy: environmental regulation and competitive advantage, 33.

Roheim, C.A., Asche, F., & Santos, J.I. (2011). The elusive price premium for eco-labelled products: evidence from seafood in the UK market. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 655-668. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2011.00299.x.

Roheim, C.A., Gardiner, L., & Asche, F. (2007). Value of brands and other attributes: Hedonic analysis of retail frozen fish in the UK. Marine Resource Economics, 22(3), 239-253. doi: 10.1086/679972.

Sammer, K., &Wüstenhagen, R. (2006). The influence of eco‐labelling on consumer behavior. Results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(3), 185-199. doi: 10.1002/bse.522.

Savelli, E., Murmura, F., Liberatore, L., Casolani, & N., Bravi, L. (2017). Consumer attitude and behaviour towards food quality among the young ones: empirical evidences from a survey. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(1-2), 169-183. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1300055.

Schäufele, I., & Hamm, U. (2017). Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 379-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118.

Shaw, D., & Clarke, I. (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: an exploratory study. Marketing intelligence & planning. doi: 10.1108/02634509910260968.

Sidali, K.L., Spiller, A., & von Meyer-Höfer, M. (2016). Consumer expectations regarding sustainable food: Insights from developed and emerging markets. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 19(3), 141-170.

Sidiropoulos, E. (2018). The personal context of student learning for sustainability: Results of a multi-University research study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 537-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.083.

Tate, W.L., Ellram, L.M., & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of supply chain management, 46(1), 19-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03184.x.

Taufique, K.M.R., Polonsky, M.J., Vocino, A., & Siwar, C. (2019). Measuring consumer understanding and perception of eco‐labelling: Item selection and scale validation. International journal of consumer studies, 43(3), 298-314. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12510.

Teisl, M.F., Roe, B., & Hicks, R.L. (2002). Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labelling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43(3), 339-359. doi: 10.1006/jeem.2000.1186.

Thilsted, S.H., Thorne-Lyman, A., Webb, P., Bogard, J.R., Subasinghe, R., Phillips, M.J., & Allison, E.H. (2016). Sustaining healthy diets: The role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era. Food Policy, 61, 126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.02.005.

Tully, S.M., & Winer, R.S. (2014). The role of the beneficiary in willingness to pay for socially responsible products: a meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 255-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2014.03.004.

Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R.M., & Verbeke, W. (2014). Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49, 137-150. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002.

Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R.M., Seo, H.S., Zhang, B., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecological Economics, 118, 215-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.011.

Varese, E., Pellicelli, A.C., & Bollani, L. (2022 in press). Are consumers really informed on Corporate Social Responsibility labels for fishery products? Results of an Italian case study. In: 2021 International Conference on Comprehensible Science Proceeding, Eilat, Israel, June 18-20, 2021, Springer.

Vecchio, R., & Annunziata, A. (2013). Consumers’ attitudes towards sustainable food: a cluster analysis of Italian University students. New Medit, 12(2), 47-56.

Velarde, A., Fàbrega, E., Blanco-Penedo, I., & Dalmau, A. (2015). Animal welfare towards sustainability in pork meat production. Meat Science, 109, 13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.010.

Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Sioen, I., Van Camp, J., & De Henauw, S. (2007). Perceived importance of sustainability and ethics related to fish: A consumer behavior perspective. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(7), 580-585. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[580:PIOSAE]2.0.CO;2.

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194. doi: 10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3.

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542-553. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007.

Vlaeminck, P., Vandoren, J., Vranken, L., Squicciarini, M., & Swinnen, J. (2016). Consumers’ willingness to pay for fair trade chocolate. In The Economics of Chocolate (edited by M.P. Squicciarini and J. Swinnen) Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK), 180-193.

Yaktine, A.L., & Nesheim, M.C. (Eds.). (2007). Seafood choices: balancing benefits and risks. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (USA).

Zadek, S. (2007). The path to corporate responsibility. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (DE), 159-172. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_13.

Zadek, S., Lingayah, S., & Forstater, M. (1998). Social labels: Tools for ethical trade. New Economics Foundation, London (UK).

Zander, K., Padel, S., &Zanoli, R. (2015). EU organic logo and its perception by consumers. British Food Journal, 117(5), 1506-1526. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2014-0298.

Zeng, S. X., Meng, X.H., Yin, H.T., Tam, C.M., & Sun, L. (2010). Impact of cleaner production on business performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 975-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.019.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-24

How to Cite

Varese, E., Pellicelli, A. C., & Bollani, L. (2022). CONSUMERS’ CONSCIOUSNESS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FISHERY PRODUCTS WITH ECOLABELS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ITALY: AN ITALIAN EMPIRICAL STUDY. Proceedings International Conference on Fisheries and Aquaculture, 7(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.17501/23861282.2021.7104