YOLO V8 FOR ESTIMATION OF SHRIMP BODY WEIGHT FROM IMAGES

Authors

  • Farid Inawan Principal Engineering
  • Lukman Hakim
  • Syauqy Nurul Aziz
  • Liris Maduningtyas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1750123861282.2023.10106

Keywords:

penaeus vannamei, image processing, machine learning algorithms, shrimp weight

Abstract

Penaeus vannamei, a highly cultured species, accounted for 51.7% of the total shrimp production, reaching 5.8 million tonnes globally in 2020 (FAO, 2022). Despite its substantial production, the shrimp farming industry faces various challenges, including shrimp growth monitoring, which is a critical aspect of production. Monitoring shrimp growth not only determines the rate of growth but also affects feeding efficiency. Currently, shrimp growth rate assessment relies on traditional methods that calculate average values from sampled data, introducing potential biases and necessitating time-consuming processes, such as the drying of shrimps before scaling takes place. To address these limitations, this research proposes a novel approach integrating image processing and machine learning algorithms to estimate shrimp weight. Specifically, we combine the YOLO V8 detection algorithm with logarithmic regression. YOLO V8 detects shrimp and measures their height in images, and then, utilizing the detected shrimp objects, we predict their weight through logarithmic regression. Our proposed algorithm achieves a Mean Average Error (MAE) of 0.6 grams in shrimp weight estimation, providing a more efficient and accurate alternative for shrimp growth monitoring in the industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research, 30, 79-82. doi:10.3354/cr030079

Dai, J., He, K., & Sun, J. (2015). BoxSup: Exploiting Bounding Boxes to Supervise Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). doi:10.1109/ICCV.2015.191

Yu, R., & Leung, P. (2005). Optimal harvesting strategies for a multi-cycle and multi-pond shrimp operation: A practical network model. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 68(4), 339-354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2005.01.018

Xi, M., Rahman, A., Nguyen, C., Arnold, S., & McCulloch, A. (2023). Smart headset, computer vision and machine learning for efficient prawn farm management. Aquacultural Engineering, 102, 102339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2023.102339

Arumuganathan, T., Shruthi, R., & Raghavendar, S. (2022). Soil NPK Prediction Using Multiple Linear Regression. 2022 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), (pp. 542-546). doi:10.1109/ICACCS54159.2022.9785338

FAO. (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome.

Hafiz, A. M., & Bhat, G. M. (2020). A survey on instance segmentation: state of the art. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-020-00195-x

Masson, S., Lavigne, S., Robitaille, V., & Andrews, C. (2013). The XperCount, a fast and cost-effective method for the enumeration of organisms in environmental media. Journal of Xenobiotics, 3, 26-28. doi:doi:10.4081/xeno.2013.s1.e10

Hussain, M. (2023). YOLO-v1 to YOLO-v8, the Rise of YOLO and Its Complementary Nature toward Digital Manufacturing and Industrial Defect Detection. Machines, 11(7). doi:10.3390/machines11070677

Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., & Qiu, J. (2023, January 1). YOLO by Ultralytics. Retrieved 09 22, 2023, from Github: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

How to Cite

Inawan, F., Hakim, L., Nurul Aziz, S., & Maduningtyas, L. (2023). YOLO V8 FOR ESTIMATION OF SHRIMP BODY WEIGHT FROM IMAGES. Proceedings International Conference on Fisheries and Aquaculture, 10(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1750123861282.2023.10106