THE EFFECTS OF LONG EXPOSURE TO SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE COURSES ON THE COURSE’S ENGAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING STUDENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2022.8105Keywords:
higher education, educational innovation, burnout, Education during the pandemic, engagementAbstract
After exposure to three semesters of synchronous online courses due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, higher education students faced negative effects in terms of motivation. To evaluate the impact of this long exposure to face-to-face online sessions in student’s motivation to be present and participate in class, an online survey was applied to Industrial and Systems Engineering students in a private university in Mexico at the end of each semester, beginning with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions preventing face-to-face class sessions. The survey included questions in a Likert scale for quantitative analysis and two open ended questions for qualitative analysis. A Two Sample T-test was conducted to identify significant differences in evaluations after time passed. The evaluations of different aspects, such as students' motivation to participate and be present in class showed a significant reduction between the first two semesters. Some results indicated the professors' ability to adapt the courses. The motivation to attend synchronous online sessions for mixed DFM courses (balancing practice and theory) decreased significantly between the first semester (Spring 2020) and the second semester (Fall 2020). Students' active participation during the mixed-course sessions changed significantly between Spring 2020 and Fall 2020, the latter having less participation. Notably, this demotivation was observed in the synchronous online courses.In qualitative analysis, answers were classified into categories for what student’s considered valuable and what not and findings revealed demotivation for other activities that extend students' screen time exposure, such as readings, homework, requiring software and simulators, practices, and online teamwork sessions. This analysis provides recommendations for improving students' engagement, and participation. It considers immediate future scenarios, designing more effective courses for the "new normality" and unforeseen circumstances.
Downloads
References
Baltà-Salvador, R., Olmedo-Torre, N., Peña, M., & Renta-Davids, A. I. (2021). Academic and emotional effects of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic on engineering students. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 7407-7434.
Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021). “Generation invisible?. Higher Education Students’(Non) Use of Webcams in Synchronous Online Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100068.
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 4544.
Forte-Celaya, M. R., Sandoval-Correa, A., Reséndez-Maqueda, L. F., & Oropeza, R. S. (2021, April). Findings for Flexible Digital Model (MFD) Courses to enhance women participation in Industrial and Systems Engineering Courses. In 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 530-536). IEEE.
Goppert, S. A., & Pfost, M. (2021). Undergraduate students’ perceived stress levels in summer term 2020–a comparison to preceding academic terms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 672783.
Lin, X., & Gao, L. (2020). Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 169-179.
Malik, M., & Javed, S. (2021). Perceived stress among university students in Oman during COVID-19-induced e-learning. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 28(1), 1-8.
Mheidly, N., Fares, M. Y., & Fares, J. (2020). Coping with stress and burnout associated with telecommunication and online learning. Frontiers in Public Health, 672.
Forte-Celaya, M. R., Sandoval-Correa, A., Reséndez-Maqueda, L. F., & Oropeza, R. S. (2021, April). Findings for Flexible Digital Model (MFD) Courses to enhance women participation in Industrial and Systems Engineering Courses. In 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 530-536). IEEE.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (August 10, 2016).
Molina, A., Villegas, B., Ochoa, C. P., & Miranda, J. Capítulo 10. Continuidad académica durante la Emergencia Sanitaria Global Covid-19: Educación 4.0 y el Modelo Flexible y Digital del Tecnológico de Monterrey en México como apoyo a la educación secundaria. La colaboración escuela-universidad durante la pandemia., 171.
Trochim, W. M. K., Donnelly, J. P., & Arora, K. (2016). Research methods: The essential knowledge base. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.