METHODOLOGY TO DEVELOP CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH SOCIAL NETWORKS

Authors

  • T González-Cacho Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
  • AE Martínez-Cantón Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
  • JL Coronel-Fuentes Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
  • C Cancino-Núñez Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
  • M Flores-Sánchez Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
  • CV Pérez-Lezama Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2021.7165

Keywords:

Social Networks, Critical Thinking, Educational Innovation, Higher Education, Sentiment analysis

Abstract

In the age of information and data analysis, students do not always have the disciplinary and / or transversal competences, nor do they always have the correct
strategies to select content and arguments that reinforce the construction of their disciplinary criteria, even though the tools to achieve it are at their fingertips. In the new educational model of the Tecnológico de Monterrey, a priority is to contribute to higher education through the development of critical thinking based on the personal motivations of students. As a link between the knowledge acquired and their context, an alternative that allows the above is to promote the dissemination of collective knowledge in social networks (SN). In the present work, an educational innovation is proposed that allows to combine the knowledge acquired in the classroom with the use of SN, in order to develop critical thinking in students. The methodology includes 3 phases: i) Students develop content related to the course topics, ii) Students share this content on social networks, iii) Teachers monitor the impact of publications and do the sentiment analysis. This process was successfully implemented to a total of 150 undergraduate students of different specializations and semesters during four academic terms in different subjects of the four Professional Level schools. Pre and post tests, where critical thinking competence criterion were evaluated, were performed, resulting in 74% of the students improving in at least one criteria Additionally, it was observed, based on entry and exit surveys, that the appropriate and guided use of the different SN’s, positively modifies the student's perception of the content of the subjects and the teaching of the class, since it allows them to relate academic topics with social reality, thus forming their own and responsible criterion on the published content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahern, L., Feller, J., & Nagle, T. (2016). Social media as a support for learning in universities: an

empirical study of Facebook Groups. Journal of Decision Systems, 25, 35–49.

https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1187421

Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. the role

of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers

and Education, 62, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019

Boholano, H. (2017). Smart social networking: 21st Century teaching and learning skills. Research in

Pedagogy, 7(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.45

Campbell, M. (2015). Collaborating on Critical Thinking: The Team Critique. Journal of Curriculum

and Teaching, 4(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v4n2p86

Del Barrio Fernández, Á., & Ruiz Fernández, I. (2016). Los Adolescentes Y El Uso De Las Redes

Sociales. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD de

Psicología., 3(1), 571. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v3.537

Guiller, J., Durndell, A., & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking : Face-to-face or

online discussion ? Learning and Instruction, 18, 187–200.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001

Hidayah, F., Alimah, S., & Yustinus, U. A. (2019). and Critical Thinking Skills of Students on the

Material of the Human Digestive System. Journal of Biology Education, 8(1), 62–72.

Kaur, W., Balakrishnan, V., & Singh, B. (2017). Social media sentiment analysis of thermal

engineering students for continuous quality improvement in engineering education. Journal of

Mechanical Engineering, SI 4(1), 263–272.

Kelly, S., Christen, S., & Snyder, L. G. (2013). An Analysis of Effective Online Reputation

Management: a Critical Thinking Social Media Activity. Journal of Research in Business Education,

(1), 24–35. Retrieved from

http://proxy.lib.sfu.ca/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=1

&site=ehost-live

Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Collaborative Learning and Critical Thinking: Testing the

Link. Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 726–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1291257

González-Cacho et al. /Methodology to Develop Critical Thinking through Social Networks

Lovelace, K. J., Eggers, F., & Dyck, L. R. (2016). I do and i understand: Assessing the utility ofwebbased management simulations to develop critical thinking skills. Academy of Management Learning

and Education, 15(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0203

Mahle, M. (2011). Effects of Interactivity on Student Achievement and Motivation in Distance

Education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 207.

Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning

environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer

Assisted Learning, 32(6), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12154

Mbodila, M., Ndebele, C., & Muhandji, K. (2014). The Effect of Social Media on Student’s

Engagement and Collaboration in Higher Education: A Case Study of the Use of Facebook at a South

African University. Journal of Communication, 5(2), 115–125.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0976691x.2014.11884831

O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., & K.L. E, M. (2017). Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learning,

Media and Technology, Volume 42(2), 147–170.

Pattanapichet, F., & Wichadee, S. (2015). Using space in social media to promote undergraduate

students’ critical thinking skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 38–49.

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.94170

Ranieri, M. (2019). Professional development in the digital age. Benefits and constraints of social

media for lifelong learning. Form@re : Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete, 19(2), 178–192.

https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-25353

Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: a literature review.

International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 3(2), 115–125.

Symonds, Q. Q. (2021). QS World University Rankings 2021: Top Global Universities. Retrieved

February 12, 2021, from QS Top universities website: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-worlduniversity-rankings

Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2018). Modelo Educativo Tec 21. Retrieved from

http://modelotec21.itesm.mx/files/folletomodelotec21.pdf

Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Shaw, A., Pasquini, L., & Woodward, S. (2017). Selective openness,

branding, broadcasting, and promotion: Twitter use in Canada’s public universities. Educational

Media International, 54(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1324363

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29

How to Cite

González-Cacho, T., Martínez-Cantón, A., Coronel-Fuentes, J., Cancino-Núñez, C., Flores-Sánchez, M., & Pérez-Lezama, C. (2021). METHODOLOGY TO DEVELOP CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH SOCIAL NETWORKS. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 7(1), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2021.7165