GAMIFICATION STRATEGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: LEVERAGING PAST IN THE ERA OF PANDEMIC

Authors

  • Anil Yasin Ar International Business Department, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2021.7105

Keywords:

gamification, PRISMA, educational innovation, higher educatio, COVID-19

Abstract

The on-going pandemic has shifted how education, teaching strategies, and technology interact with each other. With the universities forced by the COVID-19 to cease on-campus education and immigrate to virtual class settings, virtual tools, once perceived as a supporting or supplementary education aspect, evolve to be the center stone of contemporary education. While vast arrays of rearrangements are taking place and new ways of class delivery styles are experimenting, the need for providing an engaging online content delivery strategy still exists. As a result, to support a dynamic teaching structure and achieve desired learning outcomes, some university and college lecturers start to employ non-traditional teaching techniques. One of the most widely used and relatively controversial techniques that emerged as a solution is gamification. Whether this teaching method is effective or not has not been well established. It is also still questionable how this strategy can be utilized in a virtual learning environment. Motivated to contribute this on-going debate, the present paper proposes to conduct a systematic literature review following the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) methodology to answer the following set of questions: (1) Is gamification a viable teaching strategy? (2) What are the commonly used gamification strategies? (3) Can gamification-based teaching be incorporated to online classes? This study utilizes the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database to mine data for the last five years to answer research questions. The results indicate that gamification is an effective teaching strategy and can be easily integrated into virtual class settings. Findings contribute to the relevant literature strand while providing insight about contemporary teaching styles to lecturers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguiar-Castillo, L., Clavijo-Rodriguez, A., Hernandez-Lopez, L., Saa-Perez, D. P., & Perez-Jimenez, R. (2020). Gamification and deep learning approaches in higher education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education.

Ahern, A., Dominguez, C., McNally, C., O'Sullivan, J. J., & Pedrosa, D. (2019). A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 816-828.

Ahern, A., O'connor, T., McRuairc, G., McNamara, M., & O'Donnell, D. (2012, March 08). Critical thinking in the university curriculum – the impact on engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 125-132.

Ahmad, A., Zeeshan, F., Marriam, R., Samreen, A., & Ahmed, S. (2020, November 27). Does one size fit all? Investigating the effect of group size and gamification on learners’ behaviors in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-32.

Ames, T., Reeve, E., Stewardson, G., & Lott, K. (2017). Wanted For 21st Century Schools: Renaissance STEM Teacher Preferred. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 19-30.

Alomari, I., Al-Samarraie, H., & Yousef, R. (2019). The Role of Gamification Techniques in Promoting Student Learning: A Review and Synthesis. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 395-417.

Archer-Kuhn, B., Wiedeman, D., & Chalifoux, J. (2020). Student Engagement and Deep Learning in Higher Education: Reflections on Inquiry-Based Learning on Our Group Study Program Course in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 24(2), 107-122.

Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020, March). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-20.

Bakhanova, E., A. Garcia, J., Raffe, L. W., & Voinov, A. (2020). Targeting social learning and engagement: What serious games and gamification can offer to participatory modeling. Enviornmental Modelling & Software, 134, 1-15.

Berryman, M., SooHoo, S., Nevin, A., Barrett, T., Ford, T., Nodelman, J. D., . . . Wilson, A. (2013). Culturally responsive methodologies at work in education settings. International Journal for Researcher Development, 4(2), 102-116.

Bogost, I. (2011, August 9). Gamification Is Bullshit. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from The Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/08/gamification-is-bullshit/243338/

Bradley, J. M., Seidman, R. H., & Painchaud, S. R. (2011). Saving Higher Education. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States of America: Jossey-Bass.

Carrión-Toro, M., Santorum, M., Acosta-Vargas, P., & Aguilar, J. (2020). iPlus a User-Centered Methodology for Serious Games Design. Appled Sciences, 10(24).

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Andersson, U., Brannen, M. Y., Nielsen, B. B., & Reuber, A. R. (2016, July 21). From the Editors: Can I trust your findings? Ruling out alternative explanations in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 47, 881-897.

Danka, I. (2020). Motivation by gamification: Adapting motivational tools of massively multiplayer online role‐playing games (MMORPGs) for peer‐to‐peer assessment in connectivist massive open online courses (cMOOCs). International Review of Education, 66, 75-92.

DeMillo, R. A. (2015). Revolution in higher education : how a small band of innovators will make college accessible and affordabl. 2015, Massachusetts, United States of America: The MIT Press.

Díez-Pascual, A. M., & García Díaz, M. P. (2020). Audience Response Software as a Learning Tool in University Courses. Education Sciences, 10, 1-19.

Eggers, D. W., Hagel, J., & Sanderson, O. (2012, September 21). Mind the (Skills) Gap. Harvard Business Review.

Gobbo, F., & Russo, F. (2019). Epistemic diversity and the question of Lingua France in science and philosophy. Foundations of Science, 1-26.

Hallinger, P. (2013). A Conceptual Framework for Systematic Reviews of Research in Educational Leadership and Management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Chinn, C. A. (2016). Collaborative Learning. In L. Corno, & E. M. Anderman, Handbook of Educational Psychology (Third Edition ed., pp. 323-337). New York, United States of America: Routledge.

Jurgelaitis, M. C. (2019). Implementing gamification in a university‐level UML modeling course: A case study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 332–343.

Kamsker, S., Janschitz, G., & Monitzer, S. (2020). Digital Transformation and Higher Education: A Survey on the Digital Competencies of Learners to Develop Higher Education Teaching. International Journal of Business Education(160), 22-41.

Kapp, K. M., Blair, L., & Mesch, R. (2013). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction Fieldbook: Ideas into practive. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States of America: Wiley.

Karkoub, M., Yang, C.-L., Karkoub, W., & Raslan, M. (2020). Undergraduate Cross-Class Research Projects for Deep Learning in Engineering Education. Advanes in Engineering Education, 8(2), 1-28.

Klock, A. C., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, S. M., & Hamari, J. (2020). Tailored gamification: A review of literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 144, 1-22.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change: An Action Plan from the World's Foremost Expert on Business Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Lane, E. J. (2015). Higher Education Reconsidered: Executing Change to Drive Colletive Impact. Albany: SUNY Press.

Levitt, H. M. (2020). Reporting a Qualitative Meta-Analysis: Key Features. In H. M. Levitt, Reporting Qualitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (VII ed., pp. 161-183). Washington, DC, United States of America: American Psychological Association.

Lewis, V. (2017). ntegrated internationalism” in UK higher education: Interpretations, manifestations, and recommendations. Doctoral Thesis.

Lizandra, J., Valverde-Esteve, T., & Garcia-Masso, X. (2020). Use of mobile devices as a facilitator of the practice of physical activity in physical education lessons: experience in higher education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(6), 3629-3634.

Mainon, E. P. (2018). Leading Academic Change : Vision, Strategy, Transformation. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Mertz, M., Strech, D., & Kahrass, H. (2017). What methods do reviews of normativeethics literature use for search, selection,analysis, and synthesis? In-depth resultsfrom a systematic review of reviews. Sysematic Reviews, 6, 1-12.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, G. D., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), 1-6.

Naimpally, A., Ramachandran, H., & Smith, C. (2012). Lifelong Learning for Engineers and Scientists in the Information Age (1st Edition ed.). London: Elsevier.

Nolan, R., & Hunter, F. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education. In D. K. Deardorff, d. H. Wit, J. D. Heyl, & T. Adams, The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education (pp. 131-146). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Oliver, E. (2017). Gamification as transformative assesment in higher education. Theological Studies, 73(3), 1-15.

Panis, I. C., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Yuliati, L. (2020). Design Gamification Models in Higher Education: A study in Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(12), 244-255.

Portela, F. (2020). TechTeach—An Innovative Method to Increase the Students Engagement at Classrooms. Information, 11, 1-31.

Ruano-Borbalan, J.C. (2019). Innovation in higher education: Actors, policies and pedagogical effects. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 493-498.

Sailer, M., & Sailer, M. (2021). Gamification of in-class activities in flipped classroom lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 75-90.

Sasere, O. B., & Makhasane, S. D. (2020). Global Perceptions of Faculties on Virtual Programme Delivery and Assessment in Higher Education Institutions during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5), 181-192.

Seidlein, A.-H., Bettin, H., Franikowski, P., & Salloch, S. (2020). Gamified E-learning in medical terminology: the TERMInator tool. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1-10.

Sezgin, F., & Sezgin, E. (2019). Assessing the Perceptions of ELT Teachers on a Gamification Tool- A Scale Development. International Journal of Recent Advances in Organizational Behaviour and Decision Sciences, 5(1), 1205-1215.

Toda, M. A., Valle, P. H., & Isotani, S. (2018). The Dark Side of Gamification: An Overview of Negative Effects of Gamification in Education. In A. Cristea, I. Bittencourt, & F. Lima, Higher Education for All. From Challenges to Novel Technology-Enhanced Solutions. Maceio: Springer.

Treiblmaier, H., & Putz, L.-M. (2020, August). Gamification as a moderator for the impact of intrinsic motivation: Findings from a multigroup field experiment. Learning and Motivation, 71.

Tsay, C., Kofinas, A., & Luo, J. (2018). Enhancing student learning experience with technology-mediated gamification: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 121, 1-17.

Vanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M., & Hasan, F. H. (2020). Continuance Intentions to Use Gamification for Training in Higher Education: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Motivation, and Task Technology Fit (TTF). IEEE Access, 8, 21473-21484.

Wang, H. T., Riki, T., & Gerard, G. (2016, April). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview and New Research Directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534-544.

Webb, M. N., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee, Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 841-873). Prentice Hall International.

Wolters, G. (2015). Globalized Parochialism:Consequences of English asLinguaFrancain Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 29(2), 189-200.

World Economic Forum. (2017, May 24). 3 key steps to making sure your skills stay relevant. Geneva, Switzerland.

Xiong, Y., & Suen, K. H. (2018). Assessment approaches in massive open online courses: Possibilities, challenges and future directions. International Review of Education, 64, 241-263.

Yang, S., Lee, J. W., Kim, H.-J., Kang, M., Chong, E., & Kim, E.-m. (2020). Can an online educational game contribute to developing information literate citizens? Computers & Education, 161.

Zemsky, R., & Banning, L. (2013). Checklist for Change: Making American Higher Education a Sustainable Enterprise. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Zhang, B., Robb, N., & Eyerman, J. (2017). Virtual Worlds and Gamification to Increase Integration of International Students in Higher Education: An Inclusive Design Approach. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 32(2), 1-22.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29

How to Cite

Ar, A. Y. (2021). GAMIFICATION STRATEGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: LEVERAGING PAST IN THE ERA OF PANDEMIC. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 7(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2021.7105