A VERTICALLY INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE PROJECT WITH REAL LIFE IMPACT: MONARCH ROUTE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2021.7104Keywords:
vertically integrated project, self-regulated learning, research-based methodology, text analysis, sustainability, higher education, educational innovationAbstract
Monarch Route was a university award-winning project, having won the Premios Latinoamerica Verde in 2018. The project followed a research-based methodology and implemented a vertically integrated collaboration which included 181 undergraduate students; the entire student body enrolled in the Sustainable Development Engineering course of the Tec de Monterrey, Campus Santa Fe, in 2017. It was conducted in conjunction with the Fundación Nacional para la Conservación del Hábitat Boscoso de la Mariposa Monarca A.C. (FUNACOMM) so as to stop and revert the extinction of the monarch butterfly and at the same time promote benefits for the rural communities found throughout the migratory route of this species. The purpose of this work is to inspire the academic community to design successful projects which develop transverse and disciplinary competences. The project answered the following research question: What are the learning outcomes from participating in a project with real life impacts, working in a vertical and horizontal collaboration system? Using a mixed methodology, we describe the details of the implementation and learning outcomes. The Monarch Route project intrinsically motivated the students since it allowed them to collaborate, vertically and horizontally, in a socially relevant project, as well as having the choice and control over their education. By means of a text analysis of 22 final remarks of participating students, it was evident that they were able to recognize environmental, conservation and sustainable development problems and analyze their impact, in addition to being aware of the social aspects associated to them, and above all, recognize the link of these type of projects with their professional life and their social commitment to Mexico.
Downloads
References
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University (1998). Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Casanovas-Rubio, M. Ahearn, A. Ramos, G. y Popo-Ola, S. (2014) The research-teaching nexus: using a construction teaching event as a research tool. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 53, pp 1-15.
Cuevas Cancino, M. de la O L., Peña Becerril, M. y Camacho Zuñiga, C. (2019) Las características de un proyecto exitoso de aprendizaje: Ruta Monarca. 6º Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa CIIE, Monterrey N.L, México.
Delgado, P., (2019, May). Elección, desafío, colaboración y control: las grandes cualidades en la motivación intrínseca. Observatorio de innovación educativa del TEC de Monterrey. Retrieved from https://observatorio.tec.mx/edu-news/eleccion-desafio-colaboracion -y-control-las-grandes-cualidades-en-la-motivacion-intrinseca
ElZomor, M.; Mann, C.; Doten-Snitker, K.; Parrish, K.; Chester, M. (2018). Leveraging Vertically Integrated Courses and Problem-Based Learning to Improve Students' Performance and Skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 144(4).
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate Research Experiences Support Science Career Decisions and Active Learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
López-Gómez, E. (2015). Conectando investigación y docencia en la Universidad: Teaching research nexus. Revista Interuniversitaria, 22, pp 203 – 220.
McBride , T.O.; DeGoede, K.; Fullerton, J. (2009) Sustainable engineering vertically-integrated project scheme in undergraduate engineering education. IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Tecnology, Tempe, AZ, USA, pp. 1-6.
Modelo Educativo TEC21. (2016). Retrieved from http://modelotec21.itesm.mx/files/folletomodelotec21.pdf
Nehme, M. (2012). The Nexus between Teaching and Research – Easier Said than Done. Legal Education Review , 22, pp 241-272, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2350571
Okoye.K,Arrona-Palacios.A,Camacho-Zuñiga. C, Hammout.N, Nakamura. E, Hosseini. S. Impact of Students Evaluation of Teaching: A Text Analysis of the Teachers Qualities by Gender. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. ISSN: 2365-9440 (In Press)
Oudeyer, P.-Y., Gottlieb, J., & M. Lopes. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning. Progress in Brain Research, 229, pp. 257–284.
Rojas-Castro, P. (2017). Learning analytics. Una revisión de la literatura. Educación y Educadores, 20(1), 106-128
Savelsbergh, E.R., Prins, G.T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B.E., Draijer, J.M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, pp. 158-172.
Sinclair, S. and Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant Tools. Web. http://voyant-tools.org/.
Soper, D. (2006) Sentiment Analyzer. Web. https://www.danielsoper.com/sentimentanalysis/default.aspx.
Snyder, S.D. (2002). Vertically integrated projects and the importance of organizational culture amongst the student body. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(3), pp. 307-314. https://www.ijee.ie/articles/Vol18-3/ijee1204.pdf
Strachan, S. M., Marshall, S., Murray, P., Coyle, E. J., & Sonnenberg-Klein, J. (2019). Using Vertically Integrated Projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduate curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), pp. 1313–1328. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-10-2018-0198
