• Endah Mastuti Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
  • Dewi Retno Suminar Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia




Computer self-efficacy, test anxiety, perceived ease of use


This study aims to provide description of psychological factors such as test anxiety, computer self-efficacy, and perceived ease of use in completing computer-based tests (CBT) on first-year students. Such study is important because for first year students from different regions, not all of them have experience of CBT and there are possibilities of various psychological aspects such as CBT anxiety, Computer Self-Efficacy, and perceived ease of use affecting them in completing CBT. The subjects are 203 first-year students of Faculty of Psychology Universitas Airlangga. Scales used in this research include an adaptation of Computer Self-Efficacy scale by Compeau, DR, and Higgins, CA (1995), Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) by Taylor and Diane (2002), Perceived Ease of Use scale by Davis (1989). The results showed that the student’s test anxiety test during CBT are categorized as 16.74% low, 76.26% moderate and 7% high. Regarding computer self-efficacy, about 28.57% students had low efficacy, 59.60% with mediocre efficacy and 11.82% had high efficacy. In term of perceived ease of use of the CBT, 2.46% perceived low ease, 34,48% perceived moderate degree of ease, while 63,05% perceived high ease of use.


Alkiş, N. (2010). Identifying Factors That Affect Students’ Acceptance Of Web-Based Assessment Tools Within The Context Of Higher Education. Master Dissertation, Middle East Technical University.

Balogun, A. G., & Olanrewaju, A. S., 2016, Role of computer self-efficacy and gender in computer-based test anxiety among undergraduates in Nigeria. Psychological Thought, 9(1), pp.58–66. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v9i1.160

Bartram, D.S., 2001. Group plc, Thames Ditton, Surrey, UK dan Hambleton, Ronald K, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA. Computer-Based Testing and the Internet.

Bodmann, S.M. and Robinson, D.H., 2004. Speed and performance differences among computer-based and paper-pencil tests. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), pp.51-60.

Cassady, J.C. and Gridley, B.E., 2005. The effects of online formative and summative assessment on test anxiety and performance. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2336501

Clariana, R. and Wallace, P., 2002. Paper–based versus computer–based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), pp.593-602.

Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A., 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, pp.189-211. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/249688?seq=7

Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, pp.319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Lu, H., Hu, Y.P. and Gao, J.J., 2016. The effects of computer self-efficacy, training satisfaction and test anxiety on attitude and performance in computerized adaptive testing. Computers & Education, 100, pp.45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.012

Mastuti,E. (2014) Pemanfaatan Teknologi Dalam Menyusun Evaluasi Hasil Belajar : Kelebihan dan kelemahan “Tes Online” untuk mengukur hasil belajar mahasiswa. Unpublished article disseminated at Konferensi Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, Bali.

Maqableh, M., Moh’d Taisir Masa, R.E. and Mohammed, A.B., 2015. The acceptance and use of computer based assessment in higher education. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 8(10), p.557.

Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G., 2001. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management, 38(4), pp.217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6

Olafare, F.O., 2011, Students’characteristics As Predictors Of Their Perceptions On The Effectiveness Of Computer-Based Test In Nigerian Universities. Retrieved from http://aiou.edu.pk/sab/pje/Pakistan%20Journals/VOL-28,%20ISSUE-II%202011/2-Ogunlade%20&%20OLAFARE%20Students%20Characteristics%20and%20Perceptions%20on%20Computer.pdf.

Redecker, C., 2013. The use of ICT for the assessment of key competences. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission Scientific and Policy Report. https://doi.org/10.2791/87007

Shermis, M.D. and Lombard, D., 1998. Effects of computer-based test administrations on test anxiety and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), pp.111-123.. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00035-6

Self Evaluation . 2016. Annual Report Faculty of Psychology, AIrlangga University

Terzis, V. and Economides, A.A., 2011. The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), pp.1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017




How to Cite

Mastuti, E., & Suminar, D. R. (2019). TEST ANXIETY, COMPUTER SELF EFFICACY, AND PERCEIVED EASE OF USE DURING COMPUTER-BASED TEST ON FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 4(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.17501/icedu.2018.4112