Think Aloud Analysis of Probability Word Problems among College Students


  • Suzieleeze Serene bt Abdul Rahim



strategy, problem solving, probability, think-aloud


This study explores the strategies used in solving probability word problems by a college student. Problem solving with various ways of solutions was a bit complicated for students in need to choose the best strategy to solve them. Thinking aloud used as an analysis tool to evaluate the influence thought and behaviour of the participants in the study during solving seven tasks. Three participants were chosen as a preliminary of a case study. An in-depth semi-structured interview was conducted together with the think-aloud analysis to gain rich and thick descriptions from the participants. Protocols were coded and analyzed to determine what strategies they used and why they choose those strategies to solve the problems. Results indicated that participants loved to use visual representations as strategies in solving probability problems such as basic diagrams and sketches without knowing the accuracy of its effect.


Aitken, L. M., & Mardegan, K. J. (2000). “Thinking aloud”: data collection in the natural setting. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(7), 841–853.

Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1138–1144.

Ang, L. H., & Shahrill Masitah. (2014). Identifying Students’ Specific Misconceptions in Learning Probability. International Journal of Probability and Statistics, 3(2), 23–29.

Bahagian Matrikulasi. (2018). Curriculum Specifications Mathematics 2 (DM025). Retrieved from

Baltaci, S., & Evran, A. (2016). Examination Of Gifted Students’ Probability Problem Solving Process In Terms Of Mathematical Thinking. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, (4).

Bamberger, M. E. (2003). Methods College Students Use to Solve Probability Problems and the Factors that Support of Impede their Success. Oregon State University.

Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on Teaching and Learning Probability. The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education.

Batanero, C., & Sanchez, E. (2013). What is the Nature of High School Students’ Conceptions and Misconceptions About Probability? In Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 43–71).

Beitzel, B. D., Staley, R. K., & DuBois, N. F. (2011). The (in)effectiveness of visual representations as an aid to solving probability word problems. Effective Education, 3(1), 11–22.

Beitzel, B. D., Stally, R. K., & DuBois, N. F. (2011). When Best Intentions Go Awry The Failures of Concrete Representations to Help Solve Probability Word Problems. Educational Research Quarterly, 34(3), 3–14. Retrieved from

Borovcnik, M. (2012). Multiple perspectives on the concept of conditional probability. Avances de Investigación En Educación Matemática, (2), 5–27.

Corter, J. E., & Zahner, D. C. (2007). Use of External Visual Representations in Probability Problem Solving. Statistics Education Research Journal.

Danisman, S., & Tanisli, D. (2017). Examination of Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Probability. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 16–34. Retrieved from

Debrenti, E. (2015). Visual Representations in Mathematics Teaching: an Experiment With Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(1), 1–15.

Diaz, C., & Batanero, C. (2009). University Students’ Knowledge and Biases in Conditional Probability Reasoning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 21–52.

Effandi Zakaria, & Normah Yusoff. (2009). Attitudes and Problem-Solving Skills in Algebra Among Malaysian Matriculation College Students. European Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 8,(December), 232–245.

Galavotti, M. C. (2015). Probability Theories and Organization Science: The Nature and Usefulness of Different Ways of Treating Uncertainty. Journal of Management, 41(2), 744–760.

Gulkilik, H., & Arikan, A. (2012). Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teacher’s Views about Using Multiple Representations in Mathematics Instruction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(2006), 1751–1756.

Huerta, M. P. (2016). Researching Conditional Probability Problem Solving, (January 2014).

In’am, A. (2014). The implementation of the Polya method in solving Euclidean geometry problems. International Education Studies, 7(7), 149–158.

Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in Problem Solving-mathematics Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4119–4123.

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.

Krawec, J. L. (2014). Problem Representation and Mathematical Problem Solving of Students of Varying Math Ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 103–115.

Kurnaz, M. A., & Arslan, A. S. (2014). Effectiveness of Multiple Representations for Learning Energy Concepts: Case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 627–632.

NCTM. (2010). Why is Teaching with Problem Solving Important to Student Learning? National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 13(12), 1–6.

Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary School Students’ Difficulties in Mathematical Problem Solving. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2012), 3169–3174.

Tan, C.-K., & Tan, C.-P. (2015). Teaching Probability With Graphic Calculator Instructional Approach. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(5), 11–23.




How to Cite

YUSUF, M. B., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. bt. (2019). Think Aloud Analysis of Probability Word Problems among College Students. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 5(1), 88–95.