QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP (QSAR) STUDY OF EUGENOL DERIVATIVES AS ANTIOXIDANT COMPOUNDS

Authors

  • K Triatmaja Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  • SY Prabawati
  • PD Widiakongko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/26827026.2022.1102

Keywords:

QSAR, Eugenol, Antioxidants, Hartree Fock, 6-311G

Abstract

Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) are one of the main problems in the health sector. This problem is shown by 70% of the world's deaths caused by NCDs. One way to overcome this is with Eugenol which is an antioxidant, indicated by an IC50 value of 4,38 μg/mL. The development of derivatives of eugenol compounds resulted in lower antioxidant activity values than eugenol activity. A study of the Quantitative Structure and Activity Relationship (QSAR) was carrying out on eugenol derivative compounds with antioxidant activity. This study aims to analyze the QSAR of eugenol-derived compounds and determine the computational model of the QSAR equation for eugenol-derived compounds. The data used are 21 data on eugenol-derived compounds that have been tested for their antioxidant activity using the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical experimentally (in vitro) from various literature. The data calculates computationally using the Hartree Fock (HF) calculation with a basis set of 6-311G. The computational results obtained are then analyzed using the multilinear regression method. The results of the QSAR analysis showed that the linear correlation coefficient (R) was 0,973, which means the predictive activity value was close to the experimental activity value. The best QSAR equation model obtained was compiled by an electronic descriptor with the energy parameter HOMO and the energy difference HOMO-LUMO (Gap), a hydrophobic descriptor with a log P parameter, and a steric descriptor with a Balaban index, with the equation model:

Log IC50 = 6,442 + (26,257) HOMO + (9,231) GAP + (0,056) LOGP – (0,433) BALABAN

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, N., Purwono, B., and Tahir, I. (2007). Structure – Antioxidant Activities Relationship Analysis of Isoeugenol, Eugenol, Vanilin and Their Derivatives. English Journal of Chemistry, 7(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21714

Arba, M., Andriansyah, R., and Leonita, M. (2016). Quantitative Relationship Study of the Activity Structure of Meisoindigo Derivative Compounds as Cdk4 Inhibitors. Journal of Research Chemistry, 1(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkr.v1i2.3090

Asmuruf, F., Futwembun, A., and Kopeuw, A. J. (2017). Electronic Structure Characteristics in Goniotalamin, Infecttokaryon And Kurzicalkolakton Compounds Using The Density Functional Theory (DFT) Method. AVOGADRO Journal of Chemistry, 1(1), 1–5.

Da Silva, F. F.M., Monte, F. J. Q., de Lemos, T. L. G., do Nascimento, P. G. G., de Medeiros Costa, A. K., and de Paiva, L.M.M. (2018). Eugenol derivatives: synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Chemistry Central Journal, 12(34), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0407-4

Dhiman, P., Malik, N., and Khatkar, A. (2019). Lead Optimization for Promising Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor from Eugenol for the Treatment of Neurological Disorder: Synthesis and In Silico Based Study. BMC Chemistry, 13(38), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-019-0552-4

La Kilo, J., and La Kilo, A. (2019). QSAR Antimalarial Study of Quinolon-4(1H)-imines Derivative Compounds Using mlr-ann method. Jambura Journal of Chemistry, 1(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.34312/jambchem.v1i1.2104

Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., and Feeney, P. J. (2012). Experimental and Computational Approaches to Estimate Solubility and Permeability in Drug Discovery and Development Settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(SUPPL.), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.019

Male, Y. T., Sutapa, I. W., and Pusung, Y. A. D. (2018). Prediction of anticancer Potential of Xanthon Derivative Compounds using Quantitative Relationship of Structure and Activity (QSAR). Chem. Prog. , 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35799/cp.11.1.2018.27608

Mardianingrum, R., Nuraisah, A., and Ruswanto. (2018). Quantitative Relationship of Antimalarial Structure-Activity of Quinoline-Pyrazolopyridine Derivative Compounds. Journal of Pharmacopolium, 1(3), 136–142.

Perwira, G., Kasmui, and Hadisaputro, S. (2015). Quantitative Relationship Analysis of the Structure of Antioxidant Activity of Apigenin-Derived Compounds. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Science, 4(3).

Santos, C.B. R., Lobato, C.C., Braga, F. S., Morais, S. S. S., Santos, C. F., Fernandes, C. P., Brazil, D. S.B., Hage-Melim, L. I. S., Macêdo, W. J.C., and Carvalho, J.C. T. (2014). Application of Hartree-Fock Method for Modeling of Bioactive Molecules Using SAR and QSPR. Computational Molecular Bioscience, 04(01), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4236/cmb.2014.41001

Siswandono. (2016). Medical Chemistry (Kedu Edition). Airlangga University Press.

Sohilait, J., and Kainama, H. (2019). Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Essential Oil of Eugenia caryophylata from Amboina Island and Derivatives of Eugenol. Open Chemistry, 17(1), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0047

Soleh, A.M., and Aunuddin. (2013). Lasso: Alternative Solutions to The Selection of Changers and Shrinkage Coefficients Of Linear Regression Models. Indonesian Journal of Statistics, 18(1), 21–27.

Tjahjono, H., and Fadhilah, Q. (2012). Quantitative Relationship of Structure and Activity of 3-Haloasilaminobenzoilurea Derivative Compounds as Inhibitors of Microtubule Formation. Acta Pharmaceutica English, 37(3), 76–82.

Winarsi, H. (2007). Natural Antioxidants and Free Radicals. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

World Health Organiation. (2020). Non-Communicable Diseases Progress Monitor 2020. In World Health Organization (Issue Oct). https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11410_18

Downloads

Published

2022-10-13

How to Cite

Triatmaja, K., Prabawati, S., & Widiakongko, P. (2022). QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP (QSAR) STUDY OF EUGENOL DERIVATIVES AS ANTIOXIDANT COMPOUNDS. Proceedings of the International Conference on Food, Nutrition, Health and Lifestyle, 1(01), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.17501/26827026.2022.1102