A CRITICAL APPROACH TO MEDIA STUDIES: EXAMPLES OF #HASHTAG CAMPAIGNS

Authors

  • Azhagan Chenganna Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Mauritius, Mauritius

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2018.4201

Keywords:

media studies, protest, human experience, justice

Abstract

Media research and theories have been criticized for being Euro and US-centric. Important concepts like freedom and democracy have been defined mainly from western perspectives with grand narratives about the social impact of the media. Hence, media have been assimilated to powerful agents which manipulate audiences and mediacentrism has been the dominant frame through which media effects has been understood. In a context where media has become ubiquitous, even in the Global South, there is the need to revisit our understanding of the impact of media on society. Based on the contemporary realities of mediated societies and focusing on #hashtag movements, the paper argues that there is the need to re-align key concepts of media studies in order to understand contemporary communicative practice. Through an exploration of #hashtag movements like #MeToo which has had a global impact raising awareness about sexual harassment and violence, #rhodesmustfall in South Africa which denounced institutional racism and called for the decolonization of university curricula in Africa and the #fightfortruthmu movement to support investigative journalism and truth in Mauritius, this paper proposes an outline on what could be a critical reflection of the fields of media based on human experience and reciprocity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Bruijn, M, Brinkman, I and Nyamnjoh (2013) Side@Ways: mobile margins and the dynamics of communication in Africa. Cameroon: Laagaa

Bennett, W. L and Segerberg. A (2012) The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 739-768

Boucher. V (2018) Asia Argento calls #MeToo the most important thing to happen for women since the the right to vote. [Accessed: 25 April 2018] “https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/asia-argento-calls-metoo-important-thing-happen-women-right-vote-1102700”

Bosch, T (2016) Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: the case of #RhodesMustFall. Information, Communication & Society, pp. 221-232

Boyd.d (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi. Z (Ed) Networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. London: Routledge, pp. 39-58

Cadwalladr, C (2018)“I made Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool”: meet the data war whistleblower. [Accessed on 20 March 2018] “https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/data-war-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-faceook-nix-bannon-trump”

Correa, C (2018)The #MeToo moment: for U.S. Gymnasts, why did justice take so long? [Accessed on 19 March 2018]“https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/the-metoo-moment-for-us-gymnasts-olympics-nassar-justice.html”

Couldry. N (2010) Why voice matters: Culture and Politics after Neoliberalism. London: Sage publications

Etzioni.A(2018) #MeToo: America’s fastest-changing conversation. [Accessed on 19 March 2018] “http://nationalinterest.org/feature/metoo-americas-fastest-changing-conversation-24506”

Mouffe. C (2005) On the political. NY: Routledge

Mercea. D (2012) Digital prefigurative participation: the environement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media & Society, 14(1), pp. 153-169

Mercea. D, Iannelli. L and Loade.B. D (2015)Protest communication ecologies. Information, Communication and Society, 19(2), pp. 279-289

Papacharissi. Z (2015) Affective publics: Sentiment, Technology and Politics. UK: Oxford University Press

Wasserman.H (2017) African histories of the internet. Internet histories: Digital Technologies, Culture & Society, UK : Routledge, pp. 1-9

Downloads

Published

2019-09-18

How to Cite

Chenganna, A. (2019). A CRITICAL APPROACH TO MEDIA STUDIES: EXAMPLES OF #HASHTAG CAMPAIGNS. Proceedings of the World Conference on Media and Mass Communication, 4(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2018.4201