CONTROVERSIES OVER CONTEXTUAL CHANGES: AN IN- DEPTH ANALYSIS OF DAT RUNG PHUONG NAM (2023) FILM ADAPTATION

Authors

  • Liem Bui Quoc RMIT University Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501.24246778.2024.8101

Keywords:

Contextual Changes, Film Adaptation, Controversies, Literary Works, Critical Reception

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the controversies that emerged from the contextual changes in the film adaptation of Dat Rung Phuong Nam (2023). The study addresses three main research questions. First, it analyses how the film's contextual changes differ from the original novel and how they are received by the viewers and critics. Second, it evaluates the effect of these controversies on the film's box office performance and critical recognition. Third, it reveals the challenges and opportunities that arise from adapting literary works to the screen, based on the case of Dat Rung Phuong Nam. The study uses a combination of textual analysis, audience reception studies, and industry perspectives to enhance the understanding of the complex dynamics involved in adapting literary masterpieces to the cinematic medium. The study also highlights the nuances of audience engagement and the implications for commercial outcomes and critical reception. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books:

Cahir, L. C. (2014). Literature into film: Theory and practical approaches. McFarland.

Corrigan, T. (2011). Film and literature: An introduction and reader (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Dick, P. K. (1968). Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Doubleday.

Edgar-Hunt, R., Marland, J., & Rawle, S. (2010). The language of film. AVA Academia.

Elliott, K. (2003). Rethinking the novel/film debate. Cambridge University Press.

Gioi, Doan. (1957). Đất Rừng Phương Nam [The Southern Land and Forests]. Hội Nhà Văn.

Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.

Leitch, T. (2009). Film adaptation and its discontents. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Murray, S. (2012). The adaptation industry: The cultural economy of contemporary literary adaptation (Vol. 32). Routledge.

Sanders, J. (2015). Adaptation and appropriation. Routledge.

Articles in Edited Collections:

Johnson, D. T. (2017). Adaptation and fidelity. In G. Graff & L. Hutcheon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of adaptation studies (pp. 37-53). Oxford University Press.

Naremore, J. (2000). Introduction: Film and the reign of adaptation. In J. Naremore (Ed.), Film adaptation (pp. 1-16). Rutgers University Press.

Stam, R. (2000). Beyond fidelity: The dialogics of adaptation. In J. Naremore (Ed.), Film adaptation (pp. 54-76). Rutgers University Press.

Articles in Journals:

Alqadi, K. H. (2023). Interdisciplinary approach to literary narrative and visual storytelling. Migration Letters, 20(S3), 296-313.

Fussfeld Cohen, O. (2014). The new language of the digital film. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 42(1), 47-58.

Murray, S. (2008). Materializing adaptation theory: The adaptation industry. Literature/Film Quarterly, 36(1), 4-20.

Websites:

Saigoneer (2022, January 4). A movie adaptation of "Đất Rừng Phương Nam" will hit theaters in late 2022 https://saigoneer.com/film-tv/20832-a-movie-adaptation-of-%C4%91%E1%BA%A5t-r%E1%BB%ABng-ph%C6%B0%C6%A1ng-nam-will-hit-theaters-in-late-2022.

Tuoi Tre News (2023, September 25). From page to screen: Book-adapted film brings Vietnam's Mekong Delta to life https://tuoitrenews.vn/.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-21

How to Cite

Bui Quoc, L. (2024). CONTROVERSIES OVER CONTEXTUAL CHANGES: AN IN- DEPTH ANALYSIS OF DAT RUNG PHUONG NAM (2023) FILM ADAPTATION. Proceedings of the World Conference on Media and Mass Communication, 8(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17501.24246778.2024.8101