DIALOGUE OR MONOLOGUE: A STUDY ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN URBAN IMAGE COMMUNICATION BASED ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Authors

  • MANG LI Faculty Communication and Media Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia 2School of literature and Media, Suzhou University, China
  • Shazleen
  • HUI
  • AHLAM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2023.7103

Keywords:

Keywords: public participation, government agency, social media, dialogue mechanism, city image communication

Abstract

The dialogue feature of social media has made it not only a vehicle for communicating the image of a city, but also the rising power of the public, opening new opportunities for the public to work with government agencies to promote the communication of a city's image. As the two main bodies of urban image communication, the communication between the public and government agencies through social media is strengthening. But does this active participation form a dialogue mechanism with government agencies and jointly promote the development of urban image communication, or is it just the public's monologue? Focusing on this issue, this study attempts to understand the impact of citizens' social media participation on the relationship between the subjects of urban image communication, and explores the mechanism for establishing a cooperative dialogue between the two subjects. This study mainly uses the qualitative research method of in-depth interview, combined with the observation method and using the city of Suzhou in Anhui Province as a case study. Based on interviews with public and government new media operators and managers in Suzhou and observations of their social media interactions, we found that the interactive dialogue between the public and government agencies is more convenient and in-depth than in the traditional media period, but no effective dialogue mechanism has been formed, public participation has not been fully valued by the government, and there is a problem of monologue. This study provides new ideas for the formation of a dialogue mechanism between the public and the government in city image communication, and explores the path to solve the monologue dilemma of public participation, to promote the improvement of the effectiveness of city image communication under communication participation and help urban development. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babbie, E. R. (2013). The Basics of Social Research. Cengage Learning.

Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3. 77-101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. In Sage eBooks. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA79601482.

Chen, X. (2000). Qualitative Research in Social Science. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.

Clerc, L. (2015). Compte rendu de [Relational, Networked and Collaborative Approaches to Public Diplomacy. The Connective Mindshift, Rhonda S. Zaharna, Amelia Arsenault et Ali Fisher (dir.), 2013, New York, Routledge, 240 p.] Études internationales, 46(1), 103–105.

Cui, G. (2010). Seeing the Sun through the Clouds: The Basic Idea of Husserl's Phenomenological Method. Shanghai Education and Research (12), 13-16.

Dang, D., & Wang, S. (2021). Analysis of the current situation and future development trend of urban communication research. Journal of Guangxi Vocational and Technical College (01), 39-45+66.

Deng, N. (2022). Platform Participation and Convenient Interaction: Dual Variations of Citizen Network Participation——The Evolution and Enlightenment of Online Government-Civil Interaction in Singapore. Journal of the Party School of Ningbo Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China (03), 68-79.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.

Gadamer, H. (2013). Truth and Method. Bloomsbury USA Academic.

Grady, M. P. (1998). Qualitative and Action Research: A Practitioner Handbook. Phi Delta Kappa International.

Han, Y., Liu, Z., & Pei, X. (2021). The construction of urban "myth" under the public participation——Taking the image construction of Changsha in the UGC short video of Xiaohongshu as an example. New Media Research (19), 10-19.

Hennink, M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017b). Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344.

Jackson, M., Harrison, P., Swinburn, B., & Lawrence, M. (2015). Using a Qualitative Vignette to Explore a Complex Public Health Issue. Qualitative Health Research, 25(10), 1395–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315570119.

Kent, M. S., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-8111(99)80143-x.

Li, Z. (2007). On the Dialogue Spirit in Network Communication. Journal of Humanities (02), 188-191.

Liu, T. (2021). Research on urban culture communication strategy based on UGC model. Southeast Communication (02), 72-75.

Lynch, K. (1964). The Image of the City. MIT Press.

Mao, W., & Zhu, C. (2019). Research on the Impact Mechanism of Electronic Government-civilian Interaction on Urban Public Government Trust. Journal of Nanjing University (03), 51-60.

Mo, Z. (2013). Research on City Image Communication Force of CHINA. Wuhan University.

Pan, X. (2012). City Image Communication: The Role and Path of the Government. (eds.) "Communication and China · Fudan Forum" (2012) - Communicative City: Theoretical Construction and Chinese Practice Essays (pp.62).

Priporas, C., Stylos, N., & Kamenidou, I. (2020). City image, city brand personality and generation Z residents’ life satisfaction under economic crisis: Predictors of city-related social media engagement. Journal of Business Research, 119, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.019.

Sevin, E. (2016). Branding Cities in the Age of Social Media: A Comparative Assessment of Local Government Performance. In Public administration and information technology (pp. 301–320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17722-9_16.

Sun, W. (2020). I shoot, therefore I am, we check in, so the city is—Short video: Mass video practice in cyber city. International Journalism, 42(06), 6-22.

Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research. SAGE Publications, Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402196.

Wang, H. (2013). Dialogue is the life of the city——Interpretation of Lewis Mumford's urban communication concept. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (02), 104-109.

Wang, X. (2017). A New Paradigm of Public Relations Dialogue in Government Communication in the Social Media Era. Young Journalists (14), 72-73.

Wei, N., & Cui, Y. (2011). Research on the Network Participation Mechanism of Urban Community Governance. Teaching and Research, V (6), 31-36.

Xu, H. (2008). Phenomenological research methods and steps. Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing House.

Xu, J. (2020, January 8). Analysis on the Ways and Characteristics of City Image Presentation on Douyin Platform——Taking Chongqing as an Example. Retrieved from http://media.people.com.cn/GB/n1/2020/0108 /c431265-31540032.html.

Xu, N. (2012). Subject Consciousness of Urban Image Communication. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China) (12), 45-47.

Xu, X. (2022). Dialogue Communication in the New Media Era: Technology Empowerment, Generation Mechanism and Practice Path. Journal of Intelligence (03), 128-132+207.

Zhou, L., & Wang, T. (2014). Social media: A new vehicle for city marketing in China. Cities, 37, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.11.006

Downloads

Published

2023-11-14

How to Cite

LI, M., Shazleen, HUI, & AHLAM. (2023). DIALOGUE OR MONOLOGUE: A STUDY ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN URBAN IMAGE COMMUNICATION BASED ON SOCIAL MEDIA. Proceedings of the World Conference on Media and Mass Communication, 7(01), pp. 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2023.7103