THE GROWTH OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES THROUGH PUBLIC EQUITY IN SOUTH AFRICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/2357268X.2022.6105Keywords:
SME, Public Equity Finance, AltXAbstract
The study establishes whether public equity finance leads to the growth of an SME. SMEs often lack the capital required for growth. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange established AltX specifically for SMEs to participate in equity markets, enabling them to raise growth capital. However, some firms that listed on the AltX migrated to the Mainboard while some delisted, suggesting that listing may have a positive or a negative impact on the growth of an SME. To understand various sources of finance and how these impact on the growth of firms, the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure was adopted as a framework. Total population sampling was used where 81 currently and migrated AltX listed firms were approached for interviews. Data was collected through in-depth interviews from the eleven firms that responded. These firms span a range of different sectors, with an average annual turnover of R200-R500 million. Data was qualitatively analysed with ATLASti and then empirically using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), to determine the relationship between listing and growth. The study found that public equity led to the growth of SMEs. However, there are tangible and intangible attributes of listing that result in the growth of a firm, namely, raising capital (public equity) and credibility. The credibility associated with being listed led to the growth of more SMEs, than raising capital. The study recommends a significant increase in the marketing efforts of the AltX to attract more SMEs to list and better support structures to assist with the growth of listed SMEs. There are limited studies on this form of SME financing and this study contributes to the pool of literature on the subject.
Downloads
References
ABDI, A. 2014. The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(1): 37-41, DOI: 10.13189/ujer.
BALM, S. 2009. The effectiveness of the learning-cycle method on teaching dc circuits to
prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science and Technology education Vol. 23.
GERNALE, K. B. 2014. Academic performance and attitudes of grade 7 students in science
cooperative learning environment. Master’s Thesis. CMU Graduate School.
IBENEME, O. T. 2010. Differentiating instruction to meet the needs of diverse technical/technology education students at the secondary level. African Journal of Teacher Education, 1, 106-114.
JOSEPH, S. 2013. The Impact of differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: successes and challenges.
JOSEPH, S., M. THOMAS, G. SIMONETTE1 and L. RAMSOOK. 2013. The impact of
differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: successes and challenges. International Journal of Higher Education Vol. 2, No. 3.
MADDACK, M.N. 2007. An expository study in school assessment: the relationship between
achievement and attitude.
MAGDAY, E.R.J. 2011. Cognitive styles and critical thinking skills of earth science students of
Central Mindanao University laboratory high school. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis. CMU, Musuan,
Bukidnon.
MC ADAMS, J. O. 2001. Misconceptions about the nature of science, inquiry-based instruction, and constructivism: Creating confusion in the science classroom, Electronic Journal of Literacy through Science, 5(6), 1-10.
MURILLO, 2010. Learning cycle model in chemistry laboratory: effects on students’ academic
achievement and attitudes. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis. CMU, Musuan, Bukidnon.
NICOLE, A. 2014. Teacher’s beliefs as a differentiated instruction starting point: Research Basis
DO1: 10-10 16/j. sb. Spro. 03 182.
PABUALAN, M. P. 2011. Content mastery in ecology through guided inquiry-based learning among high school students. Master’s Thesis. CMU Graduate School.
PANDY, N. N. and K. KISHORE (n.d). Effect of cooperative learning on cognitive achievement in
science. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education In S.E. Asia Vol. 26, No. 2.
PIERMARINI, and E. ZAZZA. 2010. Differentiated instruction and its effect on student literacy
achievement
PILANDRA, D. P. 2010. Discovery learning: its effects on students’ achievement in first year
laboratory. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. CMU Graduate School.
PRESZLER. A. 2006. The effect of inquiry based learning environment in science and technology
course on the students’ academic achievements, Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences,
Dokuz Eylul University Institute, Izmir, Turkey, ISSN 1308-8971.
RODRIGUEZ, A. 2012. An analysis of elementary school teacher’s knowledge and use of
differentiated instruction.
TOMLINSON, C. A. 2003. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
TSAY, M. and M. BRADY. 2010. A case study of cooperative learning and communication
pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 78 – 89.
TURGUT, U. and F. GURBUZ. 2011. Effects of teaching with 5E model on students’ behaviors and their conceptual changes about the subject of heat and temperature. International Online Journal of Education Sciences. Vol. 3. No.2. Erzurum.
ZAIN, A. N. M., M. A. SAMSUDIN, R. ROHANDI and A. JUSOH. 2010. Improving students’
attitude toward science using instructional congruence. Journal of Science and Mathematics Vol. 33 No.1. Malaysia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lebogang Mosupye-Semenya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.