ASSESSMENT OF URBAN ECOSYSTEMS: A STRUCTURED APPROACH TOWARDS BUILDING RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN INDIAN TOWNS AND CITIES

Authors

  • S ROY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/2513258X.2021.5103

Keywords:

Urban Assessment Nature-based solutions, Ecosystem Health, Urban Ecosystem, Urban management

Abstract

The fast-urbanizing Indian cities are grappling with rising ecological challenges. Pollution, water insecurity, urban heat, and flooding have increased the vulnerability of the urban population. There is a need to look at urban settlements as a functioning natural ecosystem delineated by administrative boundaries and to evaluate their health regularly through a comprehensive, easy to adopt, structured approach. This study aims to track and evaluate the ecosystem health of three different categories of urban settlements: a group of metropolitan wards, a growing peripheral city, and an emerging town, through adaption of Pressure- State-Response (PSR) framework developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)’. The methodology includes indices-driven change detection of ecosystem components and pressure points on the same, by using spatial and non-spatial data, developing an impact matrix, and prioritized eco plans for action. Increasing built-up surfaces in the peripheral city (11%) and the metropolitan wards (23%) show increased pressure on their ecosystem in the form of reducing pervious surfaces. Increasing water turbidity, land surface temperatures, and aerosol content in the air depict pressure hotspots requiring mitigative, restorative, and preventive action. A significant decrease observed in heavy vegetation in the metropolitan onwards (58% in the last 5 years) and an increase in industrial activities and aerosol is observed in conjunction with increasing air temperatures and this points towards an impending change in its livability index due to anthropogenic pressures and climate change. The study concludes that a structured approach can aid in agile and sustainable management of our towns and cities and nature-based solutions provide an opportunity to restore the ecosystem balance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bolund, P. a. (1999). Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas. Ecological Economics, 293-301. Retrieved from

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013

Census, 2. (2011). Census of India 2011. Retrieved January 2021, from https://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-

prov-results/paper2-vol2/data_files/India2/1.%20Data%20Highlight.pdf

CGWB. (2019). India WRIS. Retrieved NOVEMBER 2019, from https://indiawris.gov.in/wris/#/GWQuality

CGWB. (n.d.). India WRIS. Retrieved NOVEMBER 2019, from https://indiawris.gov.in/wris/#/GWQuality

DISH, G. (2019). Directorate of Industrail Safety and Health. Retrieved 2019, from

https://mahadish.in/registered_factories/index/9

Hualou Long, X. W. (2008). Analysis of Urban-Rural Land-Use Change during 1995-2006 and Its Policy

Dimensional Driving Forces in Chongqing, China. Sensors, 8(2), 681-699. doi:10.3390/s8020681

Jari Niemelä, S.-R. S.-P. (2010). Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of

urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(11), 3225-3243.

doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8

Johnson, M. P. (2001). Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed

Research Agenda. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(4), 717-735.

doi:10.1068/a3327

K V Raju et al. (2018). Urban Environmental Governance in India. In P. o. Springer International Publishing

AG, The Urban Book Series. Springer International Publishing AG.

Ministry of Environment, F. a. (2019). Towards evolution of a framework for the preparation of state level

climate change strategy and action plan.

Nagendra H., S. H. (2013). Sub-regional Assessment of India: Effects of Urbanization on Land Use, Biodiversity

and Ecosystem Services. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and

Opportunities. Springer Dordrecht.

OECD. (2003). OECD Environmental Indicators Development measurement and use.

RAM, B. K. (1993). Remote sensing application in monitoring land-use changes in arid Rajasthan. International

Journal of Remote Sensing, 3191-3200. doi:10.1080/01431169308904433

Rees, W. E. (1996). Urban ecological footprint: Why cities cannot be sustainable – And why they are a key to

sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 223-248.

Robert I. McDonald, P. J. (2013). Urbanization and Global Trends in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In

Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 31-52).

Roy et al./ Assessment of Urban Ecosystems: A Structured Approach towards Building Resilience…..

Sutton-Grier, A. E. (2019). Conservation of Wetlands and Other Coastal Ecosystems: a Commentary on their

Value to Protect Biodiversity, Reduce Disaster Impacts, and Promote Human Health and Well-Being.

Wetlands, 39(6), 1295-1302. doi:10.1007/s13157-018-1039-0

World Bank, 2. (2019). World Bank Development Indicators. Retrieved April 2021, from

https://tradingeconomics.com/india/urban-population-percent-of-total-wb-data.html

Downloads

Published

2021-08-20

How to Cite

ROY, S. (2021). ASSESSMENT OF URBAN ECOSYSTEMS: A STRUCTURED APPROACH TOWARDS BUILDING RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN INDIAN TOWNS AND CITIES. The Proceedings of The International Conference on Climate Change, 5(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.17501/2513258X.2021.5103