NUDGING HEALTHIER PRODUCT CHOICE: FORMULATION OF ADOLESCENTS FOOD-CHOICE MOTIVES INTERVENTION IN SERANG DISTRICT, INDONESIA

Authors

  • AN Zahira Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University and Research, the Netherlands
  • J Leerlooijer Department of Social Sciences, Subdivision of Strategic Communication, and Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands
  • W Dardjono 2Research and Development Division, PKPU Human Initiative, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/26138417.2023.6103

Keywords:

food choice, adolescents, nudging, eating behaviour, intervention

Abstract

Studies found that in low-middle-income countries, many people changed their lifestyle into a modern and industrialized lifestyle. Eating habits inevitably induced by personal food choice which has an independent effect on health. Establishment of eating habits and preferences mostly occurred in young age. Eating habits during adolescence period may sustain until adulthood with consequences for long-term health problem. This project aims to develop community-based intervention programme to tackle this adolescent food choice problem, and examine the effectiveness of a selected method in a sub-urban area in Serang district, Banten, Indonesia. A research on factors that drive food choice motives on adolescents was conducted through a focus group discussion, analysed by thematic analysis. Intervention program recommendation was then formulated by intervention mapping method. To examine the effectiveness of nudging application in minimarket, an experiment with customer acceptance and shopping motives survey was executed and analysed by SPSS. The results of the research show that behaviour of target groups is determined mostly by low self-regulation, family and peer influence, and limited food preparation time. Some intervention recommendations were developed to address these determinants, e.g. family-based intervention, peer-led intervention, and school collaboration. Culturally-sensitive learning environments could also be examined to ensure the effectiveness of nutrition education in that area. Nudging as one of assumed appropriate method to tackle an impulsive behaviour seemed to be not effective in increasing healthy product sales (p=0,741; p=0,316; p=0,342; p=0,247) but the customers showed a positive attitude towards its future application

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

J Leerlooijer, Department of Social Sciences, Subdivision of Strategic Communication, and Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands

Lecturer and Education coordinator. Department of Social Sciences, Subdivision of Strategic Communication, and Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands.

 

W Dardjono, 2Research and Development Division, PKPU Human Initiative, Indonesia

Research and Development Division, PKPU Human Initiative, Indonesia

References

Bartholomew Eldrigde, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernàndez, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An Intervention Mapping approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Black, A. P., D’Onise, K., McDermott, R., Vally, H., & O’Dea, K. (2017). How effective are family-based and institutional nutrition interventions in improving children’s diet and health? A systematic review. BMC public health, 17(1), 818.

Cadario, R., & Chandon, P. (2018). Which healthy eating nudges work best? A meta-analysis of field experiments. Marketing Science (forthcoming).

Eisenmann, J. C., Gentile, D. A., Welk, G. J., Callahan, R., Strickland, S., Walsh, M., & Walsh, D. A. (2008). SWITCH: rationale, design, and implementation of a community, school, and family-based intervention to modify behaviors related to childhood obesity. BMC Public health, 8(1), 223.

Fitzgerald, A., Heary, C., Nixon, E., & Kelly, C. (2010). Factors influencing the food choices of Irish children and adolescents: a qualitative investigation. Health promotion international, 25(3), 289-298.

Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field methods, 29(1), 3-22.

Hermina, & Prihatini, S. (2016). Fruits and Vegetables Consumption of Indonesian Population in the Context of Balanced Nutrition: A Further Analysis of Individual Food Consumption Survey (SKMl) 2014. BULETIN PENELITIAN KESEHATAN, 44(3), 205-218.

Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Wiers, R. W. (2008). Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: A theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychology Review, 2(2), 111-137.

Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (January 25, 2017). Hari Gizi Nasional 2017: Ayo Makan Sayur dan Buah Setiap Hari. Retrieved from http://www.depkes.go.id/development/site/depkes/pdf.php?id=1-17012700003

Kilic, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2010). Evaluating working memory capacity and cognitive load in learning from goal based scenario centered 3D multimedia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4480-4486.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.

Lytle, L. A., Seifert, S., Greenstein, J., & McGovern, P. (2000). How do children's eating patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 14(4), 222-228.

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide.

Marhamah, M., Makrony, R., & Yuliastuti, E. (2013). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Dominan Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Remaja Untuk Mengonsumsi Makanan Fastfood.

Maulida, R., Nanishi, K., Green, J., Shibanuma, A., & Jimba, M. (2016). Food-choice motives of adolescents in Jakarta, Indonesia: the roles of gender and family income. Public health nutrition, 19(15), 2760-2768.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.

Puslitbang Upaya Kesehatan Masyarakat, Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (November, 2016). Perilaku Berisiko Kesehatan Pada Pelajar SMP dan SMA di Indonesia (Indonesia Global School-Based Student Health Survey). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/GSHS_2015_Indonesia_Report_Bahasa.pdf

Shanklin, K. R. (2014). Identification of Best Practices for Childhood Nutrition Education Interventions.

Stok, F. M., de Vet, E., de Ridder, D. T., & de Wit, J. B. (2016). The potential of peer social norms to shape food intake in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review of effects and moderators. Health psychology review, 10(3), 326-340.

Sylvetsky, A. C., Hennink, M., Comeau, D., Welsh, J. A., Hardy, T., Matzigkeit, L., ... & Vos, M. B. (2013). Youth understanding of healthy eating and obesity: a focus group study. Journal of obesity, 2013.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. International Journal of Advance Research in Management, 5(2), 18-27.

van Baalen, V. M. (2018). Promoting healthy food choices: The effect of a social proof heuristic and cognitive load on the proportion of healthy food choices (Master's thesis).

Downloads

Published

2023-07-21

How to Cite

Zahira, A., Leerlooijer, J., & Dardjono, W. (2023). NUDGING HEALTHIER PRODUCT CHOICE: FORMULATION OF ADOLESCENTS FOOD-CHOICE MOTIVES INTERVENTION IN SERANG DISTRICT, INDONESIA. Proceedings of the Global Public Health Conference, 6(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.17501/26138417.2023.6103