Context Boards in the Teaching Foreign Languages and Philological Disciplines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2020.3104Keywords:
context board, educational technology, thematic board, memorisation techniquesAbstract
: Developing modern technologies in the education sector requires brand new decisions to
improve the proceeding and memorise information. The accelerated study rate reduces the amount of
concentration and accessible time, so an average student experiences difficulty gathering knowledge
and required skills. When placed in such conditions, students and teachers find extraordinary
methods for lessons and exercises to simplify acquiring knowledge and fulfilling all the tasks. The
Context Board represents the specified topics and provides the ability to disclose a sufficient level of
knowledge appropriately. The mentioned draft is based on different ways of memorising and popular
technical capacity. The main purpose of this study is to determine the optimal method of the material
presentation within the framework of the developed project. The experiments have shown the overall
effectiveness of the context boards. The method itself takes into consideration the features of persons
with different types of information perception. It is also essential that organising the specified and
requested topics allows to systematise information and realise all the significant connections between
different subjects and choose the study format.
Downloads
References
Akhmanova, O. (1966) Dictionary of linguistic terms. Moscow. Soviet encyclopedia. p. 597
Zayachkovskaya Ksenia & Budnik Ekaterina / Context Boards in the Teaching Foreign…
Babenko, L. (2010). The concept of the Russian language: key concepts and their representations, based on
vocabulary, phraseology and paremiology. Dictionary prospectus. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing
House, 338 p.
Budnik, E., Kuvaeva, A., Leshutina I., Naumenko Yu., Vokhmina L. (2020). Enhancing and impacting of the
infographics potential as a part of directed activities related to multicode texts. 14th International scientific
conference “Society. Integration. Education” 22-23 May. Rezekne, Latvia
Crassus, N. (2009). Russian language and culture of speech. Materials for practical exercises: Textbook for
students of higher educational institutions. - Moscow. TEZAURUS. p. 97-117.
Dooly, M. (2010). Empowering Language Minorities through Technology: Which Way to Go?. Faculty of
Education, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, eLearning Papers, 19, pp. 1-12
Fetisova A. (2009, January). Methodological Possibilities of Using Involuntary Memorization in Teaching
Vocabulary. Vestn. Moscow un-that. Linguistics and intercultural communication. p.23-29.
Foer, D. (2013). Einstein Walking on the Moon: The Science and Art of Memorization. Moscow. Alpina
Publisher. p. 270.
Jackson, H., & Etienne Zé Amvela (2000). Words, Meaning, and Vocabulary, Continuum, p14.
Karpov, A. (2010, June). Educational epistemology and knowledge transformation». Vestn. iskcon. un-ta.
Philosophy. p. 79-92.
Krotova, I., & Kamoza, T., et al. (2008, April). The method of visualization in the system of innovative
education. Higher education in Russia. p. 164-167
Kuznetsov, A. (1998). Field. Big Encyclopedic Dictionary. Linguistics. Moscow. Great Russian Encyclopedia.
p. 380.
Leitner Sebastian. (2019). Spaced repetition method (From the book «How to learn to learn»). - M .: Publishing
house “Pero”. p. 106.
Madigan, S., & Rouse, M. (1974, March-June). Picture memory and visual generation processes. The American
Journal of Psychology. Vol. 87. pp. 151-158.
Osipovskaya, E., Dmitrieva S., Barabash V., Budnik, E. (2019). Cutting edge online presentation software in
higher education. 12th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation Seville, Spain.
-13 November. ISBN: 978-84-09-14755-7 / ISSN: 2340-1095 doi: 10.21125/iceri.2019
Pankina M.F. (2004, 1) The semantic space of a language and approaches to its study. Cognitive linguistics
issues. p.146-149
Passov, E. (1989). Fundamentals of communicative methods of teaching foreign language communication.
Moscow.
Persikova, T. (2017). Development of intercultural competence as one of the tasks of teaching a foreign
language. Language. Culture. Society. Actual problems, research methods and teaching problems. Collection of
articles. – Moscow. Publishing and trade corporation «Dashkov and K°. 182 p. - p. 120-135.
Polyakova, Yu. (2008, August). Russian as a foreign language: problems of assimilation. Moscow Higher
education in Russia. p. 153-155.
Porechenkova, E., & Kazantseva, S. (2015). Formation of grammatical skills of speech based on the
communicative methodology of teaching a foreign language in a non-linguistic university. Practice of teaching
foreign languages in the system of continuous education. Linguistics and intercultural communication. Moscow.
Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 19 (1).
Ryabtseva, O. (2010). Formation of the grammatical component of foreign language communicative
competence. Izv. Southern Federal University. Technical science. Taganrog. T. 111 (10), p. 116.
Zinchenko, P. (1961). Involuntary memorization. Moscow.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Zayachkovskaya Ksenia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
