HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ONTOGENIC OBSTACLES IN SOLVING SOLID GEOMETRY PROBLEMS VIEWED FROM SPATIAL ABILITY

Authors

  • S Pertiwi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • D Dasari
  • E Sumiaty

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2023.6101

Keywords:

Ontogenic obstacles, Solid geometry, Spatial ability

Abstract

Many students have difficulties understanding the topic of solid geometry due to their limited knowledge, commonly called ontogenic obstacles. This study aims to investigate what ontogenic obstacles arise when students solve solid geometry problems based on spatial ability indicators. A qualitative with case study approach was applied in this study. Participants of this study were 44 twelve graders in one of the public high schools in Serang, Indonesia. Data collection was carried out through a test consisting of 3 questions related to prerequisite material and 3 questions on solid geometry problems based on spatial ability indicators, observations and interviews with students. The results show that ontogenic obstacles found in this study include psychological, instrumental, and conceptual ontogenic obstacles. First is psychological ontogenic obstacles that occur when students do not like mathematics, so they easily forget the material they have learned. Second is instrumental ontogenic obstacles that occur when students are less prepared in understanding the distance concepts of solid geometry such as distance between point-to-point, point-to-line, and point-to-plane so students are mistaken in solving solid geometry problems based on spatial ability indicators. Third is conceptual ontogenic obstacles that occur when some students do not understand arithmetic operations, so they are confused in solving arithmetic operations related to the problem. Then overall, the ontogenic obstacles that are most often experienced by students include constructing solid figures into the appropriate plane figures, constructing plane figures that are as expected, and completing arithmetic operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics (Vol. 19). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2

Cockcroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts.

Daryanto, & Karim, S. (2017). Pembelajaran Abad 21. Gava Media.

Güven, B., & Kosa, T. (2008). THE EFFECT OF DYNAMIC GEOMETRY SOFTWARE ON STUDENT MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ SPATIAL VISUALIZATION SKILLS. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 7(4), 100–107.

Guzel, N., & Sener, E. (2009). High school students’ spatial ability and creativity in geometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1763–1766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.312

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis. In Source: Child Development (Vol. 56, Issue 6).

Maier, P. H. (1996). SPATIAL GEOMETRY AND SPATIAL ABILITY-HOW TO MAKE SOLID GEOMETRY SOLID? http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/e/gdm/1996/maier.pdf

Mcgee, M. G. (1979). Psychological Bulletin Human Spatial Abilities: Psychometric Studies and Environmental, Genetic, Hormonal, and Neurological Influences.

NCTM. (2000). Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Overview. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf#:~:text=Principles%20and%20Standards%20for%20School%20Mathematics%2C%20pub-lished%20by,system%20for%20assessing%20stu-dents%E2%80%99%20learning%20and%20program%E2%80%99s%20effectiveness.

Nurjanah. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis, Spatial Sense dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran dengan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Komputer. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Nurjanah, Dahlan, J. A., & Wibisono, Y. (2017). Design and Development Computer-Based E-Learning Teaching Material for Improving Mathematical Understanding Ability and Spatial Sense of Junior High School Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012098

Nurjanah, Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Darhim. (2014). The Enhancement of Junior High School Students Mathematical Spatial Sense Abilities Through Computer-based Interactive Multimedia Instruction. International Journal of Education, 7(2), 111–119.

Rodán, A., Gimeno, P., Elosúa, M. R., Montoro, P. R., & Contreras, M. J. (2019). Boys and girls gain in spatial, but not in mathematical ability after mental rotation training in primary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.001

Šipuš, Ž. M., & Čižmešija, A. (2012). Spatial Ability of Students of Mathematics Education in Croatia Evaluated by the Mental Cutting Test. Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae, 40, 203–216. http://ami.ektf.hu

Siswanto, R. D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Geometri Spasial Siswa SMP melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing berbantuan GeoGebra. JPPM, 10(1), 42–51.

Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan Filosofis Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR). Pusat Pengembangan DDR Indonesia.

Sutadnyana, D. M. (2013). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis E-Learning Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Spasial Geometri dan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMA [Universitas Terbuka]. http://repository.ut.ac.id/1325/

Yilmaz, H. B. (2009). On the Development and Measurement of Spatial Ability. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2). www.iejee.com

Downloads

Published

2024-01-11

How to Cite

Pertiwi, S., Dasari, D., & Sumiaty, E. (2024). HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ONTOGENIC OBSTACLES IN SOLVING SOLID GEOMETRY PROBLEMS VIEWED FROM SPATIAL ABILITY. Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Education, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2023.6101