Assessing Teaching Strategies of Stem Courses During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison Study in Performance and Learning Experience Between Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Mode in Higher Institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/26307413.2022.5103Keywords:
COVID-19, STEM, teaching methodology, online learning, higher institutionAbstract
The COVID-19 crisis has forced lecturers around the world to shift from traditional into computer screens classroom. Here, various teaching strategies adopted to support this adhoc virtual learning environment. Despite the various efforts to solve the challenges among the different teaching strategies implemented, the efficiency of the strategies is still questionable. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate the most suitable teaching strategies for STEM online education. This study presents a comparison of two different learning modes, synchronous and asynchronous mode, in terms of students' performance and learning experience in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) courses. Two STEM courses were selected: engineering and programming course. The study randomly assigned students to one of two conditions: (i) taking the course in synchronous mode - class conducted in real-time mode with lecturers via online meetings and (ii) taking the same course in asynchronous mode – online materials being provided in advance such as pre-recorded video content. Here, the course content (learning outcomes, course topics required literature and assessment) were identical for all students. Next, all students sit for an (i) assessment to assess their mastery of the course content, (ii) completed an entrance-exit survey and (iii) a self-reported satisfaction questionnaire about their learning experience and satisfaction. Content analysis has been conducted to see the relationship between student scores, learning experience and satisfaction. The results showed that there are differences of a correlation between these three factors. This study contributes to identifying the most suitable teaching strategy as well as increasing the efficiency of online learning in the context of STEM education in higher institutions.
Downloads
References
Allam, S. N. S., Hassan, M. S., Mohideen, R. S., Ramlan, A. F., & Kamal, R. M. (2020). Online Distance Learning Readiness During Covid-19 Outbreak Among Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 642–657.
Baht, S. (2020). Top 5 Reasons Why Online Learning Is Better Than Face-To-Face Learning. eLearning Industry. Retrieved from: https://elearningindustry.com/reasons-why-online-learning face-to-face-learning
Benabentos, R., Hazari, Z., Stanford, J. S., Potvin, G., Marsteller, P., Thompson, K. V., ... & Kramer, L. (2021). Measuring the implementation of student-centered teaching strategies in lower-and upper-division STEM courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(4), 342-356.
Blau, I., Weiser, O., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2017). How do medium naturalness and personality traits shape academic achievement and perceived learning? An experimental study of face-to-face and synchronous e-learning. Research in Learning Technology, 25.
Botham, R., & Mason, C. (2007). Good Practice in Enterprise Development in UK Higher Education, Birmingham, England: National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship.
Brent, R., Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2021). Promoting and managing student-student interactions in online STEM classes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(3), 797-813.
Croxto, R. A. (2014). The Role of Interactivity in Student Satisfaction and Persistence in Online Learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314.
Day, T., Chang, I. C. C., Chung, C. K. L., Doolittle, W. E., Housel, J., & McDaniel, P. N. (2021). The immediate impact of COVID-19 on postsecondary teaching and learning. The Professional Geographer, 73(1), 1–13.
Filiz, B., & Konukman, F. (2020). Teaching Strategies for Physical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Editor: Ferman Konukman. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(9), 48-50.
Duncan, K., Kenworthy, A., & McNamara, R. (2012). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous participation on students' performance in online accounting courses. Accounting Education, 21(4), 431-449.
Bouslama, F., Lansari, A., Al-Rawi, A. M., & Abonamah, A. A. (2003). A novel outcome-based educational model and its effect on student learning, curriculum development, and assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2(1), 203-214.
Garrison, G. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The internet and higher education, 13(1-2), 5-9.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
Stuart, J., O’Donnell, A. W., Scott, R., O’Donnell, K., Lund, R., & Barber, B. (2022). Asynchronous and synchronous remote teaching and academic outcomes during COVID-19. Distance Education, 43(3), 408-425.
McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73-81.
Juhaida, I., Nawal, A.R., Rozeleenda, A.R., Zazaleena, Z., & Mohd Norafizal, A.A. (2019). Assessing E-Learning Experience Using Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Among Pre-Varsity Students: The Case of UiTM. Melaka International Conference on Social Science, Science and Technology 2019, Melaka.
Kant, N. (2020). Blockchain: a resource of competitive advantage in open and distance learning system. In Blockchain Technology Applications in Education (pp. 127-152). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-5225-9478-9.ch007.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
bin Abdul Lasi, M. (2021). Online Distance Learning Perception and Readiness During Covid-19 Outbreak: A Research Review. Development, 10(1), 63-73.
Libasin, Z., Azudin, R. A., Idris, M. A., Rahman, M. S. A., & Umar, N. (2021). Comparison of Students' Academic Performance in Mathematics Course with Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning Environments during COVID-19 Crisis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 492-501.
Maqableh, M., Alia, M. (2021). Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction. Children and Youth Services Review, 128, 106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160
Nayak, S. R., Kant, N., & Anjali, K. (2020). Strategy of using ICT in ODL to disseminate higher education in tribal communities: a case of MP, India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.
Nsa, S. O., Akpan, E. O., & Williams, P. S. (2012). Instructional strategies and students’ skills acquisition in vegetable crop production. Pakistan Journal of Business and Economic Review, 3(1), 126-141.
Ogbonna, C. G., Ibezim, N. E., & Obi, C. A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-15.
Rehman, R., & Fatima, S. S. (2021). An innovation in Flipped Class Room: A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning during a pandemic. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 37(1), 131–136.
Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic medicine, 81(3), 207-212.
Saidi, R. M., Sharip, A. A., Abd Rahim, N. Z., Zulkifli, Z. A., & Zain, S. M. M. (2021). Evaluating students' preferences of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) tools. Procedia Computer Science, 179, 955-961.
Sedaghatjou, M., Hughes, J., Liu, M., Ferrara, F., Howard, J., & Mammana, M. F. (2021). Teaching STEM online at the tertiary level during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1-17.
Senthamarai, S. (2018). Interactive teaching strategies. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), S36-S38.
Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International journal of education and development using ICT, 3(2), 57-67.
Xie, H., Liu, W., & Bhairma, J. (2018, December). Analysis of synchronous and asynchronous E-learning environments. In 2018 3rd Joint International Information Technology, Mechanical and Electronic Engineering Conference (JIMEC 2018) (pp. 270-274). Atlantis Press.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778
Zhao, N., Zhou, X., Liu, B., & Liu, W. (2020). Guiding teaching strategies with the education platform during the COVID-19 epidemic: Taking Guiyang No. 1 Middle School teaching practice as an example. Sci Insigt Edu Front, 5(2), 531-539.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ismail J, ZA Saad, SN Sarmin, Z Zakariah, Abdul Rahman R, Ismail MI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
