THE EFFECTS OF PINEAPPLE CAPSULAR AND MICROBIAL FERTILISERS WITH DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATES ON FRUIT MORPHOLOGY, BIOCHEMICAL CHANGES, AND SOIL NUTRIENTS IN PEAT SOILS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/26827018.2023.8108Keywords:
fertiliser, beneficial microorganisms, peat soilAbstract
The MD2 variety of pineapple exhibits a substantial level of demand from both China and the Middle East, emphasising the significance of this crop in these regions. Most pineapple cultivation in Malaysia occurs in peat soil, requiring substantial fertiliser application throughout growth. Peat soil exhibits limited productivity and does not adequately facilitate optimal plant growth. A research investigation was undertaken to mitigate the reliance on traditional fertilisers by utilising capsular fertilisers and microbes to improve the growth of pineapple crops in peat soil. Seven treatments and four replications were performed using conventional pineapple fertiliser and capsule fertiliser with microbes at various fertiliser application rates. The pineapple cultivar employed in this study is MD2. The findings indicate no statistically significant impact on pineapple morphology when comparing capsule fertiliser and microbes to conventional fertiliser. However, the fruit weight of conventional fertiliser is slightly heavier. Nevertheless, in terms of flavour, pineapple cultivated with capsule and microbial fertiliser exhibits a more pronounced sweetness than conventional fertiliser. The observed nutrient content in the soil did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact across all treatment conditions. Nevertheless, utilising capsule fertilisers containing microbes with lower application rates than conventional fertilisers proves to be a viable approach in mitigating the overreliance on chemical fertilisers while concurrently fostering the growth of pineapple plants..
Downloads
References
Azmi, I. A., & Kassim, N. Q. B. (2022). Changes in soil microstructure and physical characteristics of peat soils under pineapple plantation. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1059(1), 012027.
Chaudhary A., Parveen H., Chaudhary P., Khatoon H., Bhatt P. (2021). "Rhizospheric microbes and their mechanism," in Microbial Technology for Sustainable Environment, eds P.
Bhatt, S. Gangola, D. Udayanga, and G. Kumar (Singapore: Springer; ). 10.1007/978-981-16-3840-4_6
Delgado, A. & Gómez, J.A. (2016). The soil. Physical, chemical and biological properties. In Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 15–26.
FAO. (2017). Food Outlook: Biannual Report on Global Food Markets. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 69–81.
Harman G., Khadka R., Doni F., Uphoff N. (2020). Benefits to plant health and productivity from enhancing plant microbial symbionts. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 610065. 10.3389/fpls.2020.610065
Huat, B. B. K., Prasad, A., Asadi, A. & Kazemian, S. (2014). Geotechnics of Organic Soils and Peat, CRC Press.
Kazemian, S., Huat, B. B. K., Prasad, A., & Barghchi, M. (2011). A state of art review of peat: Geotechnical engineering perspective. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 6, 1974–1981.
Kumar S., Kumar S. & Mohapatra T. (2021). Interaction between macro- and micro-nutrients in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 665583. 10.3389/fpls.2021.665583
Singh P., Arif Y., Miszczuk E., Bajguz A. & Hayat S. (2022). Specific roles of lipoxygenases in development and responses to stress in plants. Plants 11:979. 10.3390/plants11070979
Vishwakarma K., Kumar N., Shandilya C., Mohapatra S., Bhayana S. & Varma A. (2020). Revisiting plant–microbe interactions and microbial consortia application for enhancing sustainable agriculture: a review. Front. Microbiol. 11, 560406. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.560406
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Proceedings of the International Conference on Agriculture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.