THE CHOICE STRATEGY OF INTERNAL FIXATION IN BOXER FRACTURE: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • R Harahap Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Muhammadiyah University Semarang/Dr. Adhyatma MPH Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia.
  • PA Meisari Medical Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/3021677X.2023.1124

Keywords:

implant choice strategy, internal fixation, boxer's fracture

Abstract

A “Boxer” fracture is the fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal due to direct trauma to the fist. One of the most common causes is punching an object with a closed fist during a fight or punching a hard object. As many as 33% of patients with hand fractures are metacarpal fractures, the majority involving the fifth metacarpal. Men dominate the incidence of "boxer fracture". The peak incidence is at the ages of 10-29 years. Conservative management of "boxer fracture" tends to dislocate easily, causing flexion contractures in the finger joints and skin necrosis in the hands. Some researchers suggest surgical treatment because functionally and aesthetically the results look better. In addition, factors such as longitudinal shortening, angulation, malrotation, bone loss and soft tissue injury are indications for internal fixation. The population of boxer fracture patients mostly occurs in males of young age or productive age working with a high economic burden, so that faster recovery of hand activity is ensured. Internal fixation is an option so that the hands immediately function to work. The choice of internal fixation depends on the type and location of the fracture, soft tissue damage, age and occupation. Several internal fixation modalities for boxer's fractures such as percutaneous fixation with Krischner wire, cerclage with suture wire, intermedullary nail, plate screw to arthroplasty. By knowing the implant choice strategy according to the type and location of the fracture, soft tissue damage, age, and occupation, it is hoped that it will provide the best functional and aesthetic results in the treatment of boxer fractures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hussain M, Ghaffar A, Choudry Q, et al. (July 28, 2020) Management of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fracture(Boxer's Fracture): A Literature Review. Cureus 12(7): e9442. DOI 10.7759/cureus.9442

FeehanLM, ShepsSB. Incidence and demographics of hand fractures inBritish Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. J Hand SurgAm. 2006;31:1068–74.

Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, Wolf JM: Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population. Hand (N Y). 2012, 7:426-430. 10.1007/s11552-012-9442-0

Dunn JC et al. The Boxer’s Fracture :Splint Immobilization Is Not Necessary. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (3):188-192

Keenan M. Managing boxer's fracture: a literature review. Emerg Nurse. 2013 Sep;21(5):16, 18-24. doi: 10.7748/en2013.09.21.5.16.e1198. PMID: 24024723.

Strub B, Schindele S, Sonderegger J et al(2010) Intramedullary splinting or concervative treatment for displaced fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck? Journal of HandSurgery: Europe. 35, 9, 725-729.

Rhee P, Becker H, Rizzo M: Update on the treatment of metacarpal fractures . Curr Orthop Pract. 2012, 23:289-295. 10.1097/BCO.0b013e31825aa1e4

Beck CM, Horesh E, Taub PJ. Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures Results in Excellent Functional Outcomes: A Literature Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019Apr;143(4):1111-1118. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005478. PMID: 30676504.

She Y, Xu Y. Treatment of fifth metacarpal neck fractures with antegrade single elastic intramedullary nailing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 2;18(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1592-3. PMID: 28577350; PMCID: PMC5457582.

Kollitz KM, Hammert WC, Vedder NB, Huang JI. Metacarpal Fractures: Treatment and Complications. HAND. 2014;9(1):16-23. doi:10.1007/s11552-013-9562-1

Malik S, Herron T, Rosenberg N: Fifth Metacarpal Fractures (Boxer's Fracture) . StatPearls[Internet], Treasure Island (FL); 2020

Kamath JB, Harshvardhan, Naik DM, Bansal A: Current concepts in managing fractures of metacarpal and phalanges. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011, 44:203-211.

Padegimas EM, Warrender WJ, Jones CM, Ilyas AM: Metacarpal neck fractures: a review of surgical indications and techniques. Arch Trauma Res. 2016, 5:e32933. 10.5812/atr.32933

Galal S, Safwat W: Transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning in fifth metacarpal'sneck fractures: a randomized controlled study with patient-reported outcome. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017, 8:339-343. 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.05.015

Winter M, Balaguer T, Bessière C, Carles M, Lebreton E: Surgical treatment of the boxer's fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007,32:709-713. 10.1016/J.JHSE.2007.07.011

Boussakri H, Elidrissi M, Azarkane M, et al.: Fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal bone, treated by percutaneous intramedullary nailing: surgical technique, radiological and clinical results study (28 cases). Pan Afr Med J. 2014, 18:187. 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.187.3347

Foucher G. “Bouquet” osteosynthesis in metacarpal neck fractures:a series of 66 patients. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(3Pt 2) ; S86-90

Balaram AK, Bednar MS: Complications after the fractures of metacarpal and phalanges . Hand Clin. 2010, 26:169-177. 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.01.005

Tobert DG, Klausmeyer M, Mudgal CS: Intramedullary fixation of metacarpal fractures using headless compression screws. J Hand Microsurg. 2016, 8:134-139. 10.1055/s-0036-1593390

Yoshida R, Obopilwe E, Rodner CM: Biomechanical comparison of fifth carpometacarpal fusion methods: Kirschner wires versus plate and screws. Tech Orthop. 2018, 33:271-273.10.1097/BTO.0000000000000266

Facca S, Ramdhian R, Pelissier A, Diaconu M, Liverneaux P: Fifth metacarpal neck fracturefixation: locking plate versus K-wire?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010, 96:506-512.10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.009

Marco Rizzo,Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthritis,The Journal of Hand Surgery,Volume36,Issue2,2011,Pages345-353,ISSN0363 023,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.035.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502310014498)

Blair SJ, Swanson AB, Swanson GD. Evaluation of impairment of hand and upper extremity function. Instr Course Lect. 1989;38:73e102.

Nagle DJ, af Ekenstam FW, Lister GD. Immediate silastic arthroplasty for non-salvageable intraarticular phalangeal fractures. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1989;23(1):47e50.

Herren DB, Ishikawa H, Rizzo M, Ross M, Solomons M. Arthroplasty in the hand: what works and what doesn’t? Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). May 2021. doi:10.1177/17531934211017703

Battista, V. and Hansen, U., 2006. Conversion of a ring finger metacarpophalangeal joint arthrodesis to arthroplasty: a case report. The Journal of hand surgery, 31(9), pp.1475-1477.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Harahap, R., & Meisari , P. (2024). THE CHOICE STRATEGY OF INTERNAL FIXATION IN BOXER FRACTURE: A LITERATURE REVIEW. Proceedings of the International Conference of Community Health and Medical Sciences, 1(1), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.17501/3021677X.2023.1124