THE GROWTH OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES THROUGH PUBLIC EQUITY IN SOUTH AFRICA

Authors

  • Lebogang Mosupye-Semenya University of Johannesburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/2357268X.2022.6105

Keywords:

SME, Public Equity Finance, AltX

Abstract

The study establishes whether public equity finance leads to the growth of an SME. SMEs often lack the capital required for growth. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange established AltX specifically for SMEs to participate in equity markets, enabling them to raise growth capital. However, some firms that listed on the AltX migrated to the Mainboard while some delisted, suggesting that listing may have a positive or a negative impact on the growth of an SME. To understand various sources of finance and how these impact on the growth of firms, the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure was adopted as a framework. Total population sampling was used where 81 currently and migrated AltX listed firms were approached for interviews. Data was collected through in-depth interviews from the eleven firms that responded. These firms span a range of different sectors, with an average annual turnover of R200-R500 million. Data was qualitatively analysed with ATLASti and then empirically using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), to determine the relationship between listing and growth. The study found that public equity led to the growth of SMEs. However, there are tangible and intangible attributes of listing that result in the growth of a firm, namely, raising capital (public equity) and credibility. The credibility associated with being listed led to the growth of more SMEs, than raising capital. The study recommends a significant increase in the marketing efforts of the AltX to attract more SMEs to list and better support structures to assist with the growth of listed SMEs. There are limited studies on this form of SME financing and this study contributes to the pool of literature on the subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABDI, A. 2014. The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2(1): 37-41, DOI: 10.13189/ujer.

BALM, S. 2009. The effectiveness of the learning-cycle method on teaching dc circuits to

prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science and Technology education Vol. 23.

GERNALE, K. B. 2014. Academic performance and attitudes of grade 7 students in science

cooperative learning environment. Master’s Thesis. CMU Graduate School.

IBENEME, O. T. 2010. Differentiating instruction to meet the needs of diverse technical/technology education students at the secondary level. African Journal of Teacher Education, 1, 106-114.

JOSEPH, S. 2013. The Impact of differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: successes and challenges.

JOSEPH, S., M. THOMAS, G. SIMONETTE1 and L. RAMSOOK. 2013. The impact of

differentiated instruction in a teacher education setting: successes and challenges. International Journal of Higher Education Vol. 2, No. 3.

MADDACK, M.N. 2007. An expository study in school assessment: the relationship between

achievement and attitude.

MAGDAY, E.R.J. 2011. Cognitive styles and critical thinking skills of earth science students of

Central Mindanao University laboratory high school. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis. CMU, Musuan,

Bukidnon.

MC ADAMS, J. O. 2001. Misconceptions about the nature of science, inquiry-based instruction, and constructivism: Creating confusion in the science classroom, Electronic Journal of Literacy through Science, 5(6), 1-10.

MURILLO, 2010. Learning cycle model in chemistry laboratory: effects on students’ academic

achievement and attitudes. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis. CMU, Musuan, Bukidnon.

NICOLE, A. 2014. Teacher’s beliefs as a differentiated instruction starting point: Research Basis

DO1: 10-10 16/j. sb. Spro. 03 182.

PABUALAN, M. P. 2011. Content mastery in ecology through guided inquiry-based learning among high school students. Master’s Thesis. CMU Graduate School.

PANDY, N. N. and K. KISHORE (n.d). Effect of cooperative learning on cognitive achievement in

science. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education In S.E. Asia Vol. 26, No. 2.

PIERMARINI, and E. ZAZZA. 2010. Differentiated instruction and its effect on student literacy

achievement

PILANDRA, D. P. 2010. Discovery learning: its effects on students’ achievement in first year

laboratory. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. CMU Graduate School.

PRESZLER. A. 2006. The effect of inquiry based learning environment in science and technology

course on the students’ academic achievements, Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences,

Dokuz Eylul University Institute, Izmir, Turkey, ISSN 1308-8971.

RODRIGUEZ, A. 2012. An analysis of elementary school teacher’s knowledge and use of

differentiated instruction.

TOMLINSON, C. A. 2003. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

TSAY, M. and M. BRADY. 2010. A case study of cooperative learning and communication

pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 78 – 89.

TURGUT, U. and F. GURBUZ. 2011. Effects of teaching with 5E model on students’ behaviors and their conceptual changes about the subject of heat and temperature. International Online Journal of Education Sciences. Vol. 3. No.2. Erzurum.

ZAIN, A. N. M., M. A. SAMSUDIN, R. ROHANDI and A. JUSOH. 2010. Improving students’

attitude toward science using instructional congruence. Journal of Science and Mathematics Vol. 33 No.1. Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-15

How to Cite

Mosupye-Semenya, L. (2023). THE GROWTH OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES THROUGH PUBLIC EQUITY IN SOUTH AFRICA. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Sciences, 8(01). https://doi.org/10.17501/2357268X.2022.6105