De-mythifying the Ramayana: A Study of the ‘Devoiced’ Surpanakha

Authors

  • Aditi Dirghangi National Institute of Technology Rourkela, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2019.6102

Keywords:

Re-interpretation, Devoiced, De-mythify, Patriarchy, New woman

Abstract

The famous Indian epic Ramayana composed by poet Valmiki between the 4th and 5th century BC is a potent corpus of mythology that has affected the creative imagination of writers from all walks of life. Down the ages it has undergone numerous re-interpretations and retellings. With its grandiose narrative, it also conveys an inherent ideology that is sometimes irrefutable because of the ‘inviolate’ position it holds. To oppose these authoritative and discriminatory ideologies contemporary writers have re-narrated it with suitable mythic structures and have de-mythified the mythology according to the sensibilities of time. The hierarchical dominance of the privileged characters, and the ideology of the patriarchy are countered and the unheeded voices of the ‘minor’ characters are offered spaces to narrate their stories. This paper seeks to examine the character of Surpanakha, Ravan’s sister who is commonly perceived as ugly and brutal. She had transgressed the gender boundary and was ‘justifiably’ mutilated for expressing her sexual desire towards Ram. Surpanakha embodies the label of the ‘bad’ woman of Indian mythology who in contrast to the character of Sita, a dutiful wife who easily succumbs to subjugation, is bold and liberated. This paper analyses Kavita Kane’s Lanka’s  Princess (2017) and studies how the text gives space to Surpanakha by subverting India’s most popular tale of morality. She narrates her story, expressing the progressive outlook of a ‘new woman’ who wants to assert her individuality and is constantly punished by the societal norms for her perceived transgressions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ERNDL, M. K., 1997, The Mutilation of Surpanakha. In: Many Rāmāyanas: the Diversity of a Narrative Tradition

in South Asia edited by P. Richman (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).

HARLAN, L., and COURTRIGHT, and P. B., 1995, From the Margins of Hindu Marriage: Essays on Gender,

Religion and Culture (New York: Oxford University Press).

KANE, K., 2017, Lanka’s Princess (New Delhi: Rupa).

MENON, N., 2012, Seeing like a Feminist (New Delhi: Penguin Random House)

PYKETT, L., 1992, The “Improper” Feminine: the Women's Sensation Novel and the New Woman Writing

(London: Routledge, 1992), p.137.

SHARMA, K. S., 2011, Redefining Self: Women in Postcolonial Indian English Literature: An Indian Approach.

In: Women in Postcolonial Indian English Literature: Redefining Self edited by M. Agarwal (New Delhi: Atlantic

Publishers and Distributors).

THAPAN, M., 1998 Embodiment: Essays on Gender and Identity (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).

Downloads

Published

2020-06-07

How to Cite

Dirghangi, A. (2020). De-mythifying the Ramayana: A Study of the ‘Devoiced’ Surpanakha. Proceeding of the International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 6(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2019.6102