A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF GLOBAL BRANDS ADVERTISING STRATEGIES IN IRAN

Authors

  • Mehrnoush Zeidabadi Azad University, Iran
  • Maryam Kahvand Faculty of Visual Arts, Tehran University of Art, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2018.5102

Keywords:

Cross-culture, Cultural differences, Hall and Hofstede models, Out-door Advertising

Abstract

The success rate of international brands in the global market is affected by many factors, one of the most important of which is culture. These days, advertisements which can be adapted to meet the cultural needs of the community will be far more effective. Therefore, the researchers have studied three international outdoor advertising in Iran contributed to cultural differences from the perspective of Hall and Hofstede cultural theories. In the process of this research, which is considered Quasi-quantitative, a questionnaire was developed based on the indexes of the Hofstede and Hall models and filled in by marketing and visual communication specialists. The results indicate that “Clear” in the "indulgence" and "power distance" indicators of the Hofstede model and "non-verbal communication" indicator of the Hall model had a score higher than 5 and L’Oréal had the highest score of 5.66 in the Hall model of "being". Signal, was able to score 5.08 and 5.06 in Hofstede’s dimension of "collectivism" and Hall’s dimension of "indirectness", respectively. The results show that “Clear” follow the Hall and Hofstede models more than two other brands and "being" and "femininity" are the indicators which are considered more than other indicators in advertisements of all three brands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benedict, J. and Steenkamp, 2011, The role of national culture in international marketing research, International Marketing Review, 18(1), 30-44.

Bennett, J. M., 2009, Cultivating Intercultural Competence: A Process Perspective. Conceptualizing intercultural competence. Edited by: D. K. Dreadorff, The sage handbook of intercultural competence (California: Sage) pp. 121-140.

Clutch, How consumers view advertising: 2017 survey, Date of access: 05/02/2018 https://clutch.co/agencies/resources/how-consumers-view-advertising-survey-2017

De Mooji, M., 1998, Global Marketing and Advertising: Understanding Cultural Paradoxes (California, U.S.: Thousand Oaks).

De Mooji, M., and Hofstede, G., 2002, Convergence and divergence in consumer behavior: implications For International Retailing. Retailing, 78(1), 61-69.

De Mooji, M., Hofstede, G., 2010, The Hofstede model: applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research. Advertising, 29(1), 85-110.

Esmaelee, M., 2018, Inconsiderable, Jam-E-Jam, 9 May.

Forouzan, A., 2014, Ranking of various environmental advertisements in the city of Tehran using AHP technique, Master Of science thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University.

Hall, E.T., 1976, Beyond Culture (New York, U.S.: Garden City)

Hofstede Website, Iran cultural dimensions, Date of access: 17/05/2017

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/

Hofstede, G., 1994, Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1), 4-13.

Hofstede, G., 1997, Culture and Organizations: Software of The Mind (London, U.K.: McGrew-Hill)

Hofstede, G., 2001, Culture’s Consequences (London, U.K.: Sage).

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., 2005, Cultures and Organizations: Software of The Mind (New York, U.S.: McGraw-Hill).

Holden, N., 2004, why marketers need a new concept of culture for the global knowledge economy. International Marketing Review, 21(6), 563-572.

Ilagan, S. V., 2009, Exploring the impact of culture on the formation of consumer trust in internet shopping. Master of arts thesis, Wyoming University, Laramie, United State.

Javenppa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., Saarinen, L. And Vitale, M., 1999, Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross-cultural validation. Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2).

Kroeber, A. L., Kluchhohn C., 1952, Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University Peabody Museum of America Archeology and Ethnology.

Loosemore, M. and Al Muslmani, H. S., 1999, Construction project management in Persian Gulf: inter- cultural communication. Project Management, 17(2), 95-100.

Lusting, M., and Koester, J., 2010, Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Communication Across Culture, (Boston, U.S.: Pearson).

MEAD, M., 1951, Cultural Patterns and Technical Change (Paris, France: UNESCO).

Paranhos, M. L., Damazio, V. and Meyer, M.R., 2011, Design and cultural diversity: contributions of cross-cultural studies for the project of products and services to a plural world. Proceeding of the MX design conference, Mexico.

Robbins, S. P., Judge, T., 2007, Organizational Behavior (Boston, U.S.: Pearson).

Rojer, E. and Hart, B., 1998, Edward T Hall and the origins of the field of intercultural communication. Paper presented at meeting of the Nation Communication Association, New York.

Sanyal, R., 2001, International Management: A Strategic Perspective (New Jersey, U.S.: Prentice-Hall).

Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt J., Osborn, R. N., and Uhl-Bien, M., 2011, Organizational Behavior (New York, U.S.: Wiley).

Singh, N., Zhao, H., and Hu, X., 2005, Analyzing the cultural content of websites: a cross-national comparison of China, India, Japan and USA. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 129-146.

Yoon, H. C., 2003, With special reference to the images of elderly, The Asian Research Center for Religion and Social Communication, Date of access: 20/10/2015

Http://www.stjohn.ac.th/arc/Cultural

Zaharana, R. S., 1995, Understanding cultural preference of Arab communication pattern, Public Relation Review, 21(3), 241-255.

Zhang, Y., & Neelankavil, J., 1997, The influence of culture on advertising effectiveness in China and the USA: a cross cultural study. European Journal of Marketing, 31(2), 134-149

Downloads

Published

2019-01-30

How to Cite

Zeidabadi, M., & Kahvand, M. (2019). A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF GLOBAL BRANDS ADVERTISING STRATEGIES IN IRAN. Proceeding of the International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 5(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2018.5102