Renting the Womb- Commercial Surrogacy, Exploitation and India’s Legal Oversight

  • Dipa Dube Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
  • Ankita Chakraborty Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Keywords: forced labor, surrogacy, trafficking, exploitation

Abstract

With the advent of assisted reproductive technologies and in-vitro fertilization, a multi-billion-dollar industry driven by demand was created where female bodies were used as factories to deliver quick products, in form of babies, unrelated to the humanness of it all. In third-world countries like India, the phenomenon was considered to be more exploitative due to the prevalence of surrogacy brokers who lured marginalized women with false promises of jobs and easy money and where lack of informed consent, poverty, and ignorance, worked as catalysts. Since 2002 when India legalized commercial surrogacy, it made way for a new form of economic well-being for many who preferred to become surrogates to tide over their economic conditions; yet, dark stories of human abuse contributing to near-death situations of surrogate mothers, neonatal and prenatal mortalities, and other human rights violations were revealed. In the absence of regulatory provisions, exploitations in the garb of surrogacy practices came to the fore. Multiple cases were reported where poor women were trafficked, traded, enslaved, raped, and forcefully made to conceive babies. The introduction of the ART Bill, 2014 and Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill of 2019 sought to ban the practice of commercial surrogacy. The article highlights the ethical and legal controversies that surround commercial gestational surrogacy and situates the discussion within the milieu of labor exploitation, trafficking, and other human rights abuses. Alongside, it talks about India’s efforts to combat the menace based on international developments. The authors have undertaken a qualitative analytical approach to critically evaluate the issues concerning commercial surrogacy and its legal position. In conclusion, the authors indicate that though the Indian legislative attempts to curb the exploitative aspects of commercial surrogacy are well intended, it remains largely ineffective, especially in the context of human rights priorities of women and children.   

Author Biography

Ankita Chakraborty, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Research Scholar, Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, INDIA.

References

Babu, N. (2020, August 8). Illegal Surrogacy Link to Child Trafficking Racket. The Times of India, 1.

Baby Manji Yamada v. Union of India, 13 SCC 518 (Supreme Court 2018).

Bailey, A. (2011). Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy. Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and EData, Faculty Publications, 1, 1–31.

Bromfield, N. F., & Rotabi, K. S. (2014). Global Surrogacy, Exploitation, Human Rights and International Private Law. Global Social Welfare, 1, 123–135.

Brugger, K. (2012). International Law in the Gestational Surrogacy Debate. Fordham International Law Journal, 35(3), 666–697.

Chatterjee, Piyali. (2014). Trade of Human Eggs- A Current Trend of Reproductive Organ Trafficking. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 3(11), 51–52.

Cherry, A. L. (2014). The Rise of Reproductive Brothel in the Global Economy: Some Thoughts on Reproductive Tourism, Autonomy, and Justice. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 17(3), 257–289.

Das Gupta, S., & Das Gupta, S. (2014). Globalisation and Transnational Surrogacy in India (2nd ed.). Lexington Books.

Dube, D., Chakraborty, A., & Winterdyk, J. (2019). The Anti-Trafficking Bill 2018: Does it Fulfill India’s Committment to the International Community. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2019.1673614

Ekman, K. E. (2016). All surrogacy is Exploitation – The World Should Follow Sweden’s Ban. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/25/surrogacy-sweden-ban

Ergas, Y. (2013). Babies without Borders: Human Rights, Human Dignity, and the Regulation of International Commercial Surrogacy. Emory International Law Review, 27(1), 117–188.

ETS. (1999). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (No. 164; pp. 1–10). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168007cf98

FBI. (2011, September 8). Baby-Selling Ring Busted. https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/sandiego/press-releases/2011/baby-selling-ring-busted

Fenton-Glynn, C. (2019, April 26). Surrogacy: Why the World needs Rules for Selling Babies. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-47826356

Ferrie, J. (2018). Cambodia Frees 32 Surrogate Mothers Charged with Human Trafficking. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cambodia-surrogacy-china/cambodia-frees-32-surrogate-mothers-charged-with-human-trafficking-idUSKBN1O513U

Guihot, M. (2016). Cross-border insolvency: A case for a transaction cost economics analysis. Norton Journal of Bankruptcy Law and Practice, 25(5), 507–558.

HCCH. (1993). Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (pp. 1–9). https://assets.hcch.net/docs/77e12f23-d3dc-4851-8f0b-050f71a16947.pdf

ILO. (1930). Forced Labor Convention, 1930 (No. C029; pp. 1–2). International Labor Organisation. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C029

Kotiswaran, P., & Banerjee, S. (2020). Tracing the Journey and the Flaws of the Surrogacy Bill. Hindustan Times, 1–16.

Kumari, R. (2010). Surrogate Motherhood-Ethical or Commercial (pp. 1–173). Center for Social Research. https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/final%20report.pdf

Mirror Now. (2020, June 21). Gang Takes Women to Nepal for Surrogacy, Sella Their Infants to Childless Couples. Mirror Now Digital. https://www.timesnownews.com/mirror-now/crime/article/uttar-pradesh-gang-takes-women-to-nepal-for-surrogacy-sells-their-infants-to-childless-couples/609550

OHCHR. (1966). International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (2200A (XXI); pp. 1–8). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cescr.pdf

OHCHR. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (No. 34/180; pp. 1–10). https://www.ohchr.org/documents/professionalinterest/cedaw.pdf

OHCHR. (1989). Convention on the Rights of Child (No. 44/25; pp. 1–15). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf

OHCHR. (2002). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (No. 54/263; pp. 247–254). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc-sale.pdf

Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in Labor-Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India (1st ed.). Columbia University Press.

Pandit, A. (2020). Anti-Trafficking Bill now more Victim-Centric. Times of India.

https://news.knowledia.com/IN/en/articles/anti-trafficking-bill-now-more-victim-centric-times-of-india-0991b21a307ea07b5d44ddbf17947f219edebbcd

Parry, B. (2018). Surrogate labor: Exceptional for whom? Economy and Society, 47(2), 214–233.

Prajwala v. Union of India, 1 SCALE 298 (Supreme Court 2016).

Raghavan, S. (2020, January 2). Commercial Surrogacy: Neocolonialist Enslavement or Lucrative Livelihood? Global Affairs Daily. https://www.statecraft.co.in/article/commercial-surrogacy-neocolonialist-enslavement-or-lucrative-livelihood

Rajalakhmi, T. K. (2008). Abetting Surrogacy. FrontLine. https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/article30198210.ece

Reddy, J. (2020). Indian Surrogacy: Ending Cheap Labor. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 18(1), 91–123.

Rimm, J. (2014). Booming Baby Business: Regulating Commercial Surrogacy in India. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 30(4), 1429–1461.

Rollins, A., & Geddes, K. (2019). Human Rights Implications of Global Surrogacy (pp. 1–111). University of Chicago Law School. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ihrc/10/

Samira Kohli v. Dr Prabha Manchanda and another, 1 CPJ 56 (Supreme Court 2008).

Saravanan, S. (2018). A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India (1st ed.). Springer Nature.

Sarvanan, D. S. (2019). Surrogacy in India: Bioethics, Human Rights and Agency (pp. 1–225). European Observatory for NonDiscrimination and Fundamental Rights. http://europeanobsndfr.org/wp-content/uploads/etudes-et-rapports/final-surrogacy-report-in-india-17th-june-2019-dr-sheela-saravanan.pdf

Shanks, P. (2011, February 3). Criminal Surrogacy Ring Exposed in Thailand. Center for Genetics and Society. https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/biopolitical-times/criminal-surrogacy-ring-exposed-thailand

Singh, D. (2019). Visibilising Vulnerability through a Constitutional Lens: Revisiting Policy Making for Surrogacy in India [Vrije Universiteit]. https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/88639526/complete+dissertation.pdf

Singh, P. (2017, May 22). Cops call it Forced Surrogacy. Outlook. https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/cops-call-it-forced-surrogacy/298841

The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill, 1 (2014). https://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/draft/Draft%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%20(Regulation)%20Bill,%202014.pdf

The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, Pub. L. No. 156–C, 1 (2019). http://164.100.47.5/committee_web/BillFile/Bill/70/137/156-C%20of%202019_2019_12_12.pdf

TOI. (2013). Another Doctor Booked in Human Trafficking Case. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Another-doctor-booked-in-human-trafficking-case/articleshow/18299048.cms

UNESCO. (2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (33C/15; pp. 1–245). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000142825.page=80

UNHR. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children, including child prostitution, child pornography and other child sexual abuse material—Note by the Secretariat (A/HRC/37/60; pp. 1–20). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G18/007/71/PDF/G1800771.pdf?OpenElement

UNICEF. (n.d.). Maternal Health. UNICEF India-For Every Child. Retrieved May 9, 2020, from https://www.unicef.org/india/what-we-do/maternal-health

UNODC. (2000). Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (No. 55/25; pp. 1–10). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/ProtocolonTrafficking.pdf

Vermeulen, C. E. D. (2013). Dutch National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings and Sexual Violence against Children (pp. 1–354). https://www.dutchrapporteur.nl/binaries/national-rapporteur-on-trafficking-in-human-beings-and-sexual-violence-against-children.ninth-report-of-the-dutch-national-rapporteur.2014_tcm24-35346.pdf

Vora, K. S. (2009). Maternal Health Situations in India: A Case Study. J Health Popul Nutr, 27(2), 184–201.

Wertheimer, A. (1997). Exploitation and Commercial Surrogacy. Denver University Law Review, 74(4), 1215–1229.

WHO. (2019). India-Maternal Mortality in 2000-2017. https://www.who.int/gho/maternal_health/countries/ind.pdf

Wilkinson, S. (2016). Exploitation in International Paid Surrogacy Arrangements. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), 125–145.

Published
2021-03-23
How to Cite
Dube, D., & Chakraborty, A. (2021). Renting the Womb- Commercial Surrogacy, Exploitation and India’s Legal Oversight. Proceedings of the International Conference on Gender and Sexuality, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17501/26028611.2020.2101